Supreme Court nominee who would overturn Roe v. Wade 'would not be acceptable': Sen. Collins

PHOTO: Sen. Susan Collins speaks during a news conference at the Capitol March 21, 2018 in Washington, DC.PlayAlex Wong/Getty Images
WATCH Collins: Trump shortlist has judges 'I could not vote for'

Republican Sen. Susan Collins, a critical vote on whomever President Trump nominates to replace Justice Kennedy on the Supreme Court, said any nominee who would overturn Roe v. Wade would "not be acceptable."

Interested in Donald Trump?

Add Donald Trump as an interest to stay up to date on the latest Donald Trump news, video, and analysis from ABC News.
Add Interest

The Maine senator told ABC News Chief Global Affairs Correspondent Martha Raddatz on "This Week" Sunday that the most important trait for a potential justice is to "respect precedent."

PHOTO: Cherry blossoms frame the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, April 10, 2018. Bill Clark/Getty Images
Cherry blossoms frame the U.S. Supreme Court building in Washington, April 10, 2018.

Collins said that when she met with the president to discuss the need to fill the seat of Kennedy, who announced his retirement last week, she told him that several qualities are important, including judicial temperament, intellect, fidelity to the rule of law and "most important of all, respect for precedent."

PHOTO: Abortion rights and anti-abortion rights advocates protest in front of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2018 March for Life on Jan. 19, 2018, in Washington, D.C. Riccardo Savi/Sipa via USA TODAY
Abortion rights and anti-abortion rights advocates protest in front of the U.S. Supreme Court during the 2018 March for Life on Jan. 19, 2018, in Washington, D.C.

The Republican senator, a supporter of abortion rights, said Roe v. Wade is settled law that has been established as a constitutional right.

"A candidate who would overturn Roe would not be acceptable," she said.

Collins added that she urged the president to expand the number of people he is considering for the high court beyond his initial list.

She said there are people on Trump's list she could not support "because I believe that they have demonstrated a disrespect for the vital principle of stare decisis," which is Latin for judicial precedent.

The Maine Republican added that "it would be inappropriate" to ask a judicial nominee how they are going to vote on a future case.

"A discussion of precedent, however, is very important," Collins said. "What I want to see is a nominee who, regardless of his or her personal views on the very difficult and contentious life issue, is going to respect precedent, regardless."

Collins said, "A number of judges [have told her] that good judges are always unhappy with some of their decisions but they make the right call regardless of their personal views. And that’s what I want to see in this nominee."

Comments