Trump civil fraud case: Judge fines Trump $354M, says frauds 'shock the conscience'

After Jason Flemmons, the defense’s expert accounting witness, had testified at length about how Donald Trump's financial statements included adequate disclaimers to explain his departure from normal accounting standards, Judge Engoron interjected to push back on the testimony.

That prompted Flemmons to confirm he is attesting largely to the general accounting methods used by the Trump Organization -- not the specific numbers they provided for each of their assets.

As Flemmons gets further into his second day on the stand, Judge Engoron's initial enthusiasm regarding his testimony appears to be on the wane, with the judge sustaining more of the state’s objections and asking increasingly skeptical questions.

Donald Trump disclosed that 95% of the assets listed in his 2014 statement of financial condition departed from generally accepted accounting principles -- known in the industry as GAAP -- according to the defense's expert witness Jason Flemmons.

The testimony from the defense's accounting expert bolsters Trump's argument that the departures from GAAP in his statements were adequately disclosed to lenders, making the lenders themselves responsible for drawing their own conclusions about the valuations listed in the documents.

It also supports the defense's position that Trump's statements fell within the regulations on personal financial statements, thus shielding him from allegations of fraud.

Judge Arthur Engoron did not issue a ruling on the defense's motion for a mistrial in court, opting to give the New York attorney general time to determine if the state wants to respond to the request.

"I would ask if we could have until tomorrow to determine if we want to put in anything," state attorney Kevin Wallace said after Engoron's asked if the state plans to file a response.

The testimony of expert witness Jason Flemmons is now resuming.

In their motion for a mistrial, lawyers for Donald Trump and his adult sons argue that Judge Engoron has "predetermined the outcome of this proceeding and is merely going through the motions before it ultimately doles out punishment."

Writing that the actions of both Engoron and his clerk create an appearance of impropriety that has resulted in "biased rulings," Trump's lawyers warn of wide-reaching implications.

"Left unchecked, the introduction of such demonstrable pro-Attorney General and anti-Trump/big real estate bias into a case of worldwide interest involving the front-runner for the Presidency of the United States impugns the integrity of the entire system," they write.

Their three-pronged motion argues that the extrajudicial conduct of Engoron, the political activity of his clerk, and their rulings -- including their gag order and fines -- are each irreparable harms that can only be remedied by scrapping the entire trial.

"Only the grant of a mistrial can salvage what is left of the rule of law," they write.