For some women, agonizing over the style of their wedding dress or the flavor of their cake is not nearly as difficult as deciding whether they'll say "I do" not only to their husband's hand in marriage but also to taking his last name.
"I thought long and hard about carrying on the tradition of my own [family's] name or starting my own tradition and taking my husband's name," said 30-year-old Aga McDaniel. She eventually decided to take her husband's last name after her May 2007 wedding.
Rhiannon Kelleher, who will get married in July 2010, said that she and her fiancé also spent quite a bit of time discussing whether she would take his last name, Bruins.
"It wasn't a decision I took lightly," said Kelleher, 24, who ended up deciding to take her husband-to-be's name.
McDaniel and Kelleher are not alone in their decisions: According to two recent surveys, the majority of American women think brides should take their groom's name and many think it should be a legal requirement to do so.
Researchers at Indiana University and the University of Utah found that of approximately 850 people they surveyed nationwide, 71 percent of them agreed it is better for women to change their name upon marriage.
About 50 percent of respondents, men and women who ranged from 18 to 90, also thought that it should be a legal requirement for a woman to change her name upon marriage, according to the study.
In an even larger survey conducted by The Knot Wedding Network, 88 percent of the 18,000 couples nationwide who were asked about their name-changing plans said they were planning to adopt their spouse's name.
Rebecca Dolgin, the executive editor of TheKnot.com, a popular wedding site that is a subsidiary of The Knot Wedding Network, said that she was surprised the percentage of women who take their husband's name was so high.
"There was a point in time, maybe two decades ago, when women were less likely to take their husband's name and part of it was the feminist perspective to assert their own name and to keep their separate identity," said Dolgin.
"But today there has been a little bit of a turn and women are saying that by taking my husband's name I'm not giving in to anything and I'm still just as much a feminist as I ever was," said Dolgin.
Dolgin added that 60 percent of the survey's respondents said that their imminent name change was the "biggest post-marriage change." Only 16 percent said they considered hyphenating their maiden name with their husband's name, said Dolgin.
Respondents to the surveys provided several reasons in support of changing their name to their husband's, including the sheer convenience of having a family in which everyone has the same name.
That convenience was not lost on Kelleher, who said that she thought about her future children when deciding to take her husband's last name.
"For me, changing my name was signifying that Adam and I were starting our own family together, with the same name," said Kelleher of her relationship with her husband-to-be. "Also in terms of ease, I won't have a different name than Adam, who won't have a different name than our children."
But for other women who decided against changing their names, keeping a separate identity from their husbands even after marriage far outweighed the annoyance of having to explain why family members had different last names.