Big hurdles hinder small state's wind ambitions

New England needs new electricity sources and has some of the highest electricity rates in the nation. Wind is free and abundant along the coastline. And unlike fossil fuels, wind turbines do not produce the greenhouse gases blamed for global warming.

All of those factors were behind Rhode Island Gov. Don Carcieri's pledge nearly two years ago to bring wind power to a state where there is just one operating wind turbine. His goal was to get 15% of the state's electrical power from wind by 2011 — which would require about 100 turbines.

Several major challenges now stand in the way of the small state's big plans.

Among them: No one has decided where to put a wind farm, it's not clear how the project will be paid for, and public opposition — a major wild card — is unknown, according to Carcieri's top energy adviser, Andrew Dzykewicz.

Still, Dzykewicz is hopeful Rhode Island will be getting a large portion of its energy from wind by sometime after 2012.

Hoping to stabilize electricity costs and increase supply, Carcieri in January 2006 announced an energy plan that eventually included measures such as using hydropower, reforming the state's electric market, reducing state government's energy consumption and promoting the use of wind power. Later, he said he thought the state could reach the wind goal around the time his term ends in 2011.

This spring, his administration proposed building about 100 offshore wind turbines in Narragansett Bay, enough to power about 175,000 homes. The only major wind turbine in the state is at Portsmouth Abbey, a monastery and school.

Wind power generates less than one megawatt of electricity in Rhode Island, a tiny blip compared to the national leader, Texas, which has enough wind turbines to churn out almost 4,000 megawatts, according to the American Wind Energy Association, an industry group.

While Carcieri's administration has made some progress, it's been slow going.

"We won't have the blades turning by the time he's gone," Dzykewicz said.

Dzykewicz said he anticipates the state could have an offshore wind farm in the next five to seven years. But even that could be too optimistic.

Across the border in Massachusetts, opponents of a plan to build 130 wind turbines off Cape Cod in Nantucket Sound have stymied the Cape Wind project for more than six years because of fears that it could it could spoil views of the water and cause a hazard for boaters.

With fishing and tourism also key industries in Rhode Island, a similar proposal for an offshore wind farm could face similar opposition here.

No other state has built an offshore wind farm, forcing Rhode Island's government to invent the process nearly from scratch. One of the state's main environmental regulatory bodies, the Coastal Resources Management Council, has not even decided what it requires from prospective wind power developers.

The state also hasn't settled on a basic question: Where to put wind turbines.

Earlier this year, Dzykewicz's office assembled a panel of wind power advocates, environmentalists and others to whittle down the list of promising locations. It met four times, then decided it did not have enough information to make any decisions.

Panel members including Matt Auten, an advocate for Environment Rhode Island, a non-profit group that lobbies for tighter anti-pollution rules, praised Carcieri for seeking community input, but said picking wind farm sites is impossible until they know the environmental impact.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...