Walgreen stock: A pill that's not hard to swallow

ByABC News
November 10, 2008, 4:01 PM

— -- A: When the economy slows, consumers can postpone or eliminate many expenses.

Plan for buying a new flat-screen TV, taking a Hawaiian vacation or even buying a new car can be easily dumped when times are tough. But people have a harder time going without medicine.

If that's true, why are shares of Walgreen down a bruising 36% this year? Should shares of the drug seller be holding up better since they sell necessities? After all, shares of drugmaker Pfizer are down less than 26%, which is better than the 36% loss suffered by the market at large.

The answer is that Walgreen doesn't just sell medicine. While prescription sales accounted for 65% of revenue last year, according to the company's annual report, 35% of sales come from the items in the store that may be more profitable than drugs.

Drugstores make a great deal of their profit from non-essentials, from candy and gum to beach umbrellas. In addition, they sell items like shampoo and cleaning supplies that may be priced more aggressively at big-box retailers like Wal-Mart. And in its most recent earnings report, Walgreen acknowledged consumers are focusing more on value and price.

With this in mind, are shares of Walgreen, selling near 52-week lows, a buy? Could the company's exposure to the relative safe haven of drug sales offer protection from a weak economy? To find out, we'll put the stock through the four steps considered at Ask Matt, including:

Step 1: Risk vs. reward. When you take a risk on a stock, you want to make sure you're properly rewarded. Downloading Walgreen's trading history back to 1980, we see the company generated an average annual compound rate of price appreciation of 16.7%. That's not even including the current dividend yield of 2%. This is a very high return since the S&P 500 posted an 11.6% return in the same time frame, says IFA.com.

But, here's the catch. To get the higher return you accepted higher risk standard deviation of 34.5 percentage points. That's much higher than the 14.9 percentage point risk of the S&P 500 during the period. So to get a 44% higher return you accepted 132% higher risk. That's not a great tradeoff and should stop many investors' analysis right there. But for you risk takers out there, keep reading.