Preakness: 5 Theories on Triple Crown Drought

PHOTO: Jockey Steve Cauthen rides on Affirmed who takes the lead against jockey Jorge Velasquez and Alydar to win the Triple Crown in Belmont, New York in this June 10, 1978 file photo.
Focus on Sport/Getty Images

Another Preakness, another reminder of the achingly long drought since horseracing's last Triple Crown winner: 34 years and counting.

Affirmed (1978) was the most recent of only 11 thoroughbreds to claim the Kentucky Derby, Preakness Stakes and Belmont Stakes since 1919, and this year oddsmakers sure know how to deflate expectations by installing the Derby's second-place winner as the favorite to win the Preakness today.

But even a Preakness win by 2012 Derby-victor I'll Have Another could leave the 3-year-old chestnut where nearly a dozen horses have stood since the Affirmed Triple Crown title: winners of the first two jewels who've gone on to lose the Belmont.

Here are some theories for what has stood in their way.

The Triple Crown

PHOTO: Jockey Steve Cauthen rides on Affirmed who takes the lead against jockey Jorge Velasquez and Alydar to win the Triple Crown in Belmont, New York in this June 10, 1978 file photo.
Focus on Sport/Getty Images
Too Many Horses

This theory is grounded in probability, that the more horses in a race, the more difficult it is statistically to win. "In days gone by, we didn't have a full field come back in the Preakness and the Belmont," Graham Motion, the trainer of Went the Day Well and last year's Derby winner Animal Kingdom, told the Wall Street Journal this week.

Affirmed faced six horses in the 1978 Preakness. There will be 11 horses today in Baltimore.

The Triple Crown

PHOTO: Louie Roussel III talks with the media during the morning training for the Kentucky Derby in this April 30, 2008 file photo at Churchill Downs.
Andy Lyons/Getty Images
Too Short Recovery Time

Three top-flight races in five weeks is a mountain of stress for any horse, especially with the longer Belmont Stakes completing the cycle in New York. "A lot of horses can handle the Derby and the Preakness, and can't handle the Belmont," Louie Roussel III, who was trainer and co-owner of 1988 Preakness and Belmont winner Risen Star, told the New Orleans Times-Picayune two years ago. "The mile and a half is the true test of a champion."

Not that he's complaining: "The Triple Crown is like an iron-man contest. This is what makes the thing so wonderful."

The Triple Crown

PHOTO: Jockey Kent Desormeaux, riding Big Brown won the Preakness Stakes, giving the colt the first two events in thoroughbred racing's Triple Crown.
Brendan Smialowski/Bloomberg/Getty Images
Too Many Prep Races

Renowned horse trainer D. Wayne Lukas has pointed to the increasing importance of prep races to qualify for the Kentucky Derby, which take their toll. "Before, you didn't have to work up so hard in February and March to get ready for the Derby," he told the Times-Picayune.

Big Brown was the last horse to win the Derby and Preakness before losing the Belmont, in 2008.

The Triple Crown

PHOTO: Trainer D. Wayne Lukas watches his horses train in preparation for the 138th Kentucky Derby at Churchill Downs, May 2, 2012 in Louisville, Kentucky.
Rob Carr/Getty Images
Too Much Speed Focus

Lukas also pointed to breeders who sacrifice endurance for speed. "I think there's a trend to horses that look a little quicker," he said. "Distance horses are longer and leaner."

The Triple Crown

PHOTO: I'll Have Another, ridden by Mario Gutierrez, edges out Bodemeister, right, to win the 138th Kentucky Derby, Louisville Kentucky, May 5, 2012.
Mark Abraham /AFP/Getty Images
Too Little Luck

Yes, speed is paramount, along with resiliency and a jockey who knows his horse. But a run of good fortune doesn't hurt, either.

I'll Have Another will need it.

Join the Discussion
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...