Obama Takes Political Hit for Rejecting Spending Limits

June 20, 2008— -- Sen. Barack Obama's decision to reject public financing of his presidential run — and the spending limits that come with it — will give him a big financial advantage over Sen. John McCain this fall, but it may come at a political price.

Obama's stark abandonment of a pledge he repeatedly made during the Democratic primaries has dinged his reputation as a government reformer, and it clearly gave his critics ammunition to attack his character and paint him as a Democratic flip-flopper.

That flip-flopping image did serious damage to Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., four years ago when the Democratic candidate impaled himself with his own quote on an Iraq spending bill, explaining, "I was for it before I was against it."

Obama, D-Ill., can expect some of his own words on his commitment to public financing of presidential campaigns to be tossed in his face in the coming months.

For years Obama supported using public funds for campaigns to keep the big special-interest money out, and he was recorded more than once saying "I strongly support public financing."

On a questionaire by the good government group Common Cause, Obama wrote, "If I am the Democratic nominee, I will aggressively pursue an agreement with the Republican nominee to preserve a publicly financed general election."

And during an April 27 apperance on Fox News, Obama declared, "I have promised that I will sit down with John McCain and talk about can we preserve a public system."

Obama, who has shattered fundraising records, has tried to finesse the about-face by telling supporters that he needs more than the $89 million that would be allocated by the federal government so he can combat what he says will be Republican attacks on his character.

Obama on Thursday declared the public finance system "broken" and said that GOP operatives are masters as "gaming" the rules. So he is creating a new system of small donors to finance his campaign, stating, "You've fueled this campaign with donations of $5, $10, $20, whatever you can afford."

Nevertheless, the move has come with a political cost.