Sandra Day O'Connor Weighs In on Immigration, the Supreme Court and Civics Ed

PHOTO Former Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day OConnor spoke to George Stephanopoulos about the Supreme Court, Arizona immigration and her latest project, iCivics.

Retired U.S. Supreme Court Justice Sandra Day O'Connor sat down for an interview with "Good Morning America" anchor George Stephanopoulos on Wednesday, May 26, 2010. The following transcript of their interview has been edited for clarity.

GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS: Justice O'Connor, thank you so much for doing this.

SANDRA DAY O'CONNOR: No problem.

STEPHANOPOULOS: I was watching you out there. You are a national teacher.

O'CONNOR: Well, most mothers are, don't you think? (LAUGHTER) We have a few teachers -- little kids to teach as we go along, don't we?

STEPHANOPOULOS: And I was stunned when I first heard this. And ... I imagine you were as well. Two thirds of Americans can name a judge on "American Idol." Fewer than one in 10 can name a chief justice of the Supreme Court.

O'CONNOR: Oh, I know it. And the statistics are worse. The Annenberg Foundation takes statistics and barely one third of Americans can name the three branches of government, much less say what they do. How do you like that?

STEPHANOPOULOS: It's unbelievable. But --

O'CONNOR: It's scary.

STEPHANOPOULOS: You're doing something about that now.

O'CONNOR: I am trying as hard as I can to do something about that. Half the states have stopped making civics and government a requirement for high school. Half.

STEPHANOPOULOS: Why is that?

O'CONNOR: Well, it's partly the unintended consequence of No Child Left Behind.

STEPHANOPOULOS: 'Cause they put so much emphasis on math and science?

O'CONNOR: Now, let's go back to that. Well, American high school grads were tested along with equivalent youngsters in 20 nations. And we came in almost at the bottom of the list in capacity to do math and science. And because of that, the then-President and the then-Congress thought it would help they put federal money in a pot and schools could earn a chunk of the money if they got good test scores from their students on math, science and reading. So that was the thing that was set up, that's No Child Left Behind. And I think it worked well.

O'CONNOR: The No Child Left Behind Program was an incentive to the schools to get their kids up to snuff on math and science and reading. But they were not getting money for American history or civics, or anything else. And the result was a number of schools stopped teaching -- or giving scores on -- civics and government and history.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So no incentive?

O'CONNOR: None. And so, as a result, many of the schools just stopped teaching them. They could [fall] by the wayside. And that's what's happened. And it's a sad state of affairs.

STEPHANOPOULOS: So you're trying to create a new way --

O'CONNOR: Yes.

STEPHANOPOULOS: -- for kids to learn?

O'CONNOR: A new way. A new way through games on the website that the young people will find so entertaining that they'll play it and learn. Now here's the reason: We know also from the Annenberg polls that youngsters in middle school level -- sixth, seventh, eighth grade -- spend, on the average, 40 hours a week in front of a screen, whether it's TV or--

STEPHANOPOULOS: And they'd be more if you let them.

Page
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...