Wendy Wright, president of the conservative public policy group, Concerned Women for America, has spoken out against over-the-counter use of Plan B in the past. She said it's inappropriate for a high-dose birth control pill to be over-the-counter, considering regular birth control pills are given by prescription only.
While Wright is not opposed to prescribed birth control pills, she said that Plan B "needs medical oversight. The same act that concerns them that they might be pregnant may cause them to get an STD."
Dr. Lee Vermeulen, clinical professor of the University of Wisconsin-Madison School of Pharmacy, said that much of the protest against or advocacy for the decision to expand the availability of Plan B depends on how a person feels about the reproductive freedoms and the rights of adolescents and young adults.
"If one believes that only women who are 17 and older have the right to decide whether or not they get pregnant, then there is clearly no reason to lift the age restriction," said Vermeulen. "If one believes that any woman of child-bearing age should have the right to choose for themselves, it would be necessary to recognize that women under 17 are biologically able to conceive, and therefore the age restriction should be lifted."
"I am not aware of any clinical reasons why this product would be unsafe or ineffective in women under 17," said Vermeulen. "The medications used in this product are used in oral contraceptives, which are prescribed safely to women under 17."
Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights, said she applauds any action that will increase women's access to emergency contraception, but Teva's application does not absolve the FDA if its responsibility to comply with the court order.
"There's enough scientific evidence before the agency to decide whether to make Plan B available over-the counter, and there has been for 10 years," said Northup.
And Diana Zuckerman, president of the National Research Center for Women and Families, agrees that as long as the safety gives a green light, she supports the pill's availability.
"The FDA shouldn't make a decision based on what teen relationships should or should not be," said Zuckerman. "They should make decisions based on science."
And several scientists and doctors stand by the pill's safety.
But physicians still expressed concerns.
Gottlieb said that the FDA will need to figure out if over-the-counter availability of Plan B for teen girls will reduce the likelihood of promoting healthy outcomes, such as safe sex practice discussions, the use of condoms and abstinence.
And Dr. Henry Miller, a Robert Wesson Fellow in scientific philosophy and public policy at Stanford University, agreed.
While he doesn't have the data, Miller said he suspects that there is a significant demand for the drug in girls 17 and under, and 15-year-olds are probably not physiologically different from 17-year-olds.
"I'm making the assumption that a girl of 15 is emotionally capable of making the decision about a drug like Plan B without the required guidance of health care professionals," said Miller.
But Wright disagreed, and worried that the pill's availability would close off communication with parents and doctors.
"It's irresponsible to be making this drug easy for young people to get," said Wright. "And it could make women more likely to engage in unprotected intercourse."