A federal panel is considering overturning a ban on blood bank donations by gay men — a rule implemented 15 years ago out of fear of AIDS.
The 1985 ban declares that any man who has had sex with another man even once since 1977 cannot give blood. Now, blood bank officials say it’s time to change the rule, and the Federal Drug Administration’s Blood Products Advisory Committee is meeting today and Friday to discuss it.
“The FDA’s finally responding to the science,” says Debra Kessler, director of regional services at the New York Blood Center, the nation’s largest blood bank.
The FDA had no official comment on the possible change. Agency officials say they have reviewed the policy every few years and that their priority was the safety of the blood supply.
Any change in the policy would be implemented come months from now, if at all, says Kessler.
Science or Discrimination?
Under the current rule, a heterosexual woman who has had sex with numerous AIDS-infected partners can give blood after waiting a year, but a gay man who’s been celibate since 1978 is banned. Gay activists say that’s discrimination.
“The existing policy is archaic and discriminatory because it falsely assumes that all gay men are HIV-positive regardless of their sexual behavior. At the same time, it allows heterosexuals to donate blood even if they have participated in risky sexual or drug-use behavior,” says Martin Algaze, spokesman for Gay Men’s Health Crisis.
Safety of the blood supply is the first priority, agrees Doni Gewirtzman of the Lambda Legal Defense Fund, a legal-aid organization for gay people and people with AIDS. He suggests the current restrictions may be too tight on gays and too loose on promiscuous heterosexuals.
“Everyone is equally at risk for HIV infection. It’s about specific sexual behavior, not about sexual orientation,” says Tom Duane, a Democratic New York state senator who is both openly gay and HIV-positive.
Blood bank officials say AIDS-detection technology has vastly improved since the 1980s. Back then, tests only checked for antibodies to the virus. Now they check for parts of the virus itself.
But that doesn’t reassure Mary Romo, a blood donor in San Francisco. She doesn’t want the ban on donations from gay men lifted.
“I’m not favorable toward it at all. I don’t think many people would want to receive from the blood banks. They would want private donations instead,” she says.
Old Worries, New Fears
When the ban was enacted, “there was a great deal of anxiety and there was a lot of public concern, and we didn’t know very much [about AIDS] at the time,” says Herbert Perkins, who ran the Blood Centers of the Pacific in San Francisco back then.
Now, Kessler says, political problems, not scientific ones, are the major barrier.
“It’s mostly one of perception, not science. It’s not just gay men, but it’s also people who have used IV drugs, and prostitutes” who are under lifelong bans, she says.
The blood banks say they need the extra blood. A shortage in the New York area has reached “crisis proportions” and the bank has cut back on shipments, according to New York Blood Center President Robert Jones.
“Unless there is an immediate and dramatic donation increase, these reduced shipments will continue or grow worse,” he said in a statement.
The FDA is most likely to shift to a policy under which a gay man must have abstained from homosexual sex for five years before donating blood, Kessler says.