'Tanning Tax' in Health Care Law Has Patrons, Industry Burning

Tan-a-holics, prepare to be singed. Uncle Sam will begin collecting a 10 percent tax on all indoor tanning sessions starting July 1, as part of a little-known provision in the new health care reform law.

"That's a pretty big chunk," said James Sims, 28, an avid indoor tanner in New York, who typically spends about $400 a year on a package of 10-minute tanning sessions.

Tanning Salons Downplay Health Risks

"I'd never buy a plan like that now. … I'm already nickel and dimed on stuff," and with growing health worries, it's just not worth it, he told ABC News.

Sims, one of an estimated 28 million Americans to lie under indoor ultraviolet rays each year, said the so-called "tanning tax" caught him by surprise.

The measure is buried on page 902 of the 906-page health reform bill and was added in late December after lawmakers removed the "Botax" on elective cosmetic procedures, such as Botox and breast implants.

VIDEO: Dangers of teen tanning

The measure also has members of the body-bronzing industry fuming.

"If you're going to tax us, you should tax the travel industry and cruise industry, which also profit from sun worshippers," said Don Feltham, chief financial officer of JK Products and Services in Jonesboro, Ark., the world's largest manufacturer of indoor tanning equipment.

Feltham said the new tax would likely hurt profits at thousands of small independent tanning salons across the country, already under pressure from the recession.

Industry leaders fear consumers may cut back on the number of sessions they buy because of the higher cost, which in turn would hinder expansion of salons and financially imperil others. It might also encourage would-be new salon entrepreneurs to stay out of the business.

VIDEO: Tanning Dangers for Teens

"I find it absurd," said Jerry Deveney, author of "Sun Business" and longtime sales manager at JK Products, of the tax. "We don't mind paying a tax on our industry, but it should be fair across all of the cosmetic industry."

Tanning Industry Decries Lack of Notice, Public Hearing on New Tax

The tanning tax will raise an estimated $2.7 billion over 10 years to help pay for the $940 billion health care overhaul, according to the Joint Committee on Taxation.

VIDEO: Sunscreen 101

It was added to the bill following stiff opposition by the American Academy of Cosmetic Surgery and the American Academy of Dermatologists Association to an earlier provision that would have levied a 5 percent fee on cosmetic procedures.

"It was a tax largely against women," said Dr. Mark Berman, president of AACS, of his group's opposition to the original tax on elective cosmetic procedures.

The majority of customers for cosmetic surgery are women between the ages of 35 and 50, with an average income of $55,000 a year, according to AACS.

Allure magazines Kristin Perrotta points out the best self-tanners.

"Cosmetic surgery is a substantial industry" critical to the economy, he said. "Breast implant procedures are an economic stimulus" because of the thousands of people involved in the process along the way.

But the indoor tanning industry contends it is economically important too -- and serves a majority female clientelle. Deveney and others say politics were at play in the singling out of tanning salons for taxation, decrying the little notice or public hearing lawmakers gave the measure before it was added to the bill.

"They slipped it in in the middle of the night three days before the [Senate] bill passed on Christmas Eve," said John Overstreet of the Indoor Tanning Association.

  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like...