As President Obama said during the campaign, words matter.
Although the White House is downplaying the changes, the rhetorical shifts stem from a broader effort by the Obama administration to signal a clean break with the Bush administration -- a theme of Obama's first major foreign trip, which begins today in Great Britain.
Phrases like "war on terror" and "enemy combatants" became stand-ins for some of the least popular elements of the Bush administration's foreign policy. Shelving such phrases makes sense for a president who is trying to set a new tone on the world stage, said Matthew Dowd, a former Bush strategist.
"This is a way for the Obama administration to turn the page on Bush, even though some of the policies for many folks seem very much the same," said Dowd, who is now an ABC News contributor. "It's not going to be completely different than Bush, but changing the words has enabled them to turn the page and say, 'We're not Bush.' "
The clarity with which the language has changed hasn't been fully reflected in the policies the president has pursued. In Iraq and Afghanistan, the president is formulating policies that some of his liberal critics say could have been promulgated by his predecessor.
While Secretary of State Hillary Clinton told reporters matter-of-factly this week that the term "war on terror" isn't being used by the Obama administration, the president has yet to find an easy replacement.
In addition, the death of the term "enemy combatants" was announced in a legal filing earlier this month that nonetheless upheld the administration's right to detain those suspected of assisting al Qaeda.
"They're still operating within the 'war on terror' framework, and we think that's a problem," said Tom Parker, Amnesty International's policy director for terrorism, counterterrorism and human rights. "We don't at this point know who the real Obama is."
The administration's new language to describe "enemy combatants" in legal filings -- "Individuals who provide substantial support to al Qaeda forces in other parts of the world" -- is not only short of catchy but could mean just what "enemy combatants" did in practice, Parker said.
"There's symbolism in changing the language, and this is an administration that understands symbolism more than most," Parker told ABCNews.com. "But this was an omission, it wasn't a refutation. And if you look at the substance of what they've done, it has essentially been, with a few exceptions, stay the course. ... There hasn't been what I would call a radical break with the past."
Parker lauded the president for announcing his intention to close the prison at Guantanamo Bay, Cuba. He also applauded Obama for unequivocally renouncing torture and dropping Bush-era phrases such as "enhanced interrogation techniques" and "alternative procedures" to describe tactics than some called torture.
Such policy and linguistic changes have drawn the ire of, among others, former Vice President Dick Cheney, who stated in a recent interview that Obama's policies are making the nation less safe.