More Court Cases to Test Campaign-Finance Limits

Justice Samuel Alito, who joined the court in 2006, sided with a five-member majority in last week's opinion. His predecessor, Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, sided with four other justices in 2003 to uphold the central provisions of a sweeping campaign-finance law Congress approved in 2002.

"The climate on the Supreme Court is different, and people like James Bopp see the opportunity to recast campaign-finance legislation," Roberts said. "The big question is how far the court is willing to go."

Fred Wertheimer of the watchdog group Democracy 21 said advocates of campaign-finance limits intend to fight back in the courts and on Capitol Hill, where they are pushing legislation for taxpayer funding of congressional elections. Other bills under consideration include a measure requiring corporate executives to appear in any ads they fund.

"This a political battle that is ongoing," Wertheimer said, "and the fact that the court made a disastrous and irresponsible decision is not going to stop us from being aggressive in pursuing our goals."

Courts chip away at limits

Recent court rulings have eroded federal campaign-finance limits:

2007 | Wisconsin Right to Life v. Federal Election Commission (FEC) | Supreme Court allows labor, business and other groups to run issue ads that mention candidates by name in the final days before an election, a practice that had been outlawed under a 2002 campaign-finance law.

2008 | Davis v. FEC | Supreme Court strikes down the so-called millionaire's amendment, which allowed federal candidates to raise three times the legal limit if they were competing against wealthy candidates bankrolling their own campaigns.

2009 | EMILY's List v. FEC | A three-judge panel of a federal appeals court rules to allow non-profits to raise unlimited amounts of money to independently support or oppose federal candidates. That strikes down a Federal Election Commission rule that imposed a $5,000 cap on what individuals could give to politically oriented non-profits, such as EMILY's List, which supports female candidates who favor abortion rights. A full appellate court will take up a similar case this week.

2010 | Citizens United v. FEC | Supreme Court allows corporations and unions to tap their treasuries to spend unlimited amounts on campaign ads that call for the election or defeat of federal candidates.

-- This embed didnt make it to copy for story id = 9674897. -- This embed didnt make it to copy for story id = 9674897.
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like...