Congress is hustling into action mode as Americans grow increasingly agitated with high gasoline prices, but there are few signs of a bipartisan consensus. Nor is there much indication that Washington can help with a problem that's being driven largely by global supply-and-demand economics.
The Senate today will vote on a bill crafted by Republicans to expand offshore oil production. The legislation -- expected to fail -- comes a day after an effort by Democrats to repeal roughly $2 billion a year in tax breaks for the five largest oil and gas conglomerates was also unsuccessful.
Separately, the Republican-dominated House has passed three bills that would expand offshore oil and gas drilling.
But none of these measures will provide a quick fix to the issue of high gasoline prices, and the various legislations amount to little more than political posturing, experts say.
"There is practically nothing that Washington can do to lower prices at the pump," said Pavel Molchanov, an analyst at Raymond James, a financial advisory group. "The reality is the price of fuel is overwhelmingly set by the global oil market, by supply-and-demand dynamics, geopolitical risks... It's not helpful for policymakers to pretend otherwise."
Even lawmakers have acknowledged that Congressional bills may have little impact on the price of oil today.
"We don't seem to learn from our mistakes," Sen. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., said at a hearing Tuesday. "Unless we have an energy policy... we're going to continue to go down this for the next 20 to 30 years. We need to break this cycle."
The average national retail price of gasoline was $3.96 per gallon on Monday, according to the U.S. Energy Information Administration. That's more than $1 higher than the same time last year and nearly double the price in May two years ago. Prices are highest on the West Coast and in the mid-Atlantic region, hovering above the $4 per gallon mark.
The pressure at the pump has accelerated calls on Capitol Hill for a comprehensive energy policy, but Republicans and Democrats remain divided on how lawmakers should tackle the issue.
Experts like Molchanov say neither party's short-term proposals will result in meaningful change.
"Both parties are jumping on the bandwagon because it's politically popular at the moment, but ending tax breaks would have no real observable effect on the price of oil," he said of the Democrats' failed bill. In fact, "it would support higher prices" because there will be less drilling.
GOP calls to expand offshore oil drilling will also be little more than a drop in the bucket, he added.
"The idea that more drilling today would immediately lower prices at the pump is just silly," Molchanov said. "It's not going to move the needle in a meaningful way. Drilling today does not equate to production today."
Even in the long term, the expansion would have to be significant.
U.S. offshore production constitutes less than two percent of total global oil supply and even doubling it would hardly make a dent.
Turmoil in the Middle East has contributed to much of the turmoil in the markets, which has led to a surge in gasoline prices for consumers. Much of Libyan production remains offline as civil unrest continues to grow in that country. The volatile political climate in Syria and Yemen has also added what insiders dub a "risk premium." Until the situation in the Middle East quiets down, observers say, markets are likely to continue roiling.
The decline in the value of the U.S. dollar has also made oil purchases more costly for the United States.
Domestically, flooding in Mississippi and surrounding areas has elevated concern about disruption at refineries in the Gulf of Mexico.
Congress Attempts to Tackle High Gasoline Prices
Instead of trying to impact prices at the pump, lawmakers should be looking toward creating a long-term energy policy that alleviates pressures down the road and prevents the markets from dictating the fluctuations, experts say.
"Washington has very little to do with what people pay at the pump," said Ruchir Kadakia, director of Global Oil Fundamentals at IHS Cambridge Energy Research Associates. "If they really wanted to make a change -- given that's kind of their role... you attack the problems from both ends. You don't address it for today. You address it for 20 years down the road."
That may entail measures unpopular with the public, such as higher gasoline taxes, a move that politicians from either side of the political aisle may not be able to commit to a year away from the election.
"Until people are willing to do very responsible things for energy policy, which may mean you don't get reelected, you won't see change," Kadakia said. "I think market forces will dictate change."
Lawmakers last year put forth a slew of comprehensive energy bills, led by Massachusetts Democratic Sen. John Kerry, but even though Democrats controlled both chambers of Congress, a bill never made it to the president's desk.
Moving forward, lawmakers will attempt to tackle the issue piecemeal, but with many other priorities on the table -- including the budget and the debt ceiling -- energy policy is unlikely to take precedence.
The two sides also remain divided along partisan lines. President Obama has proposed a bold goal of expanding alternative sources of energy, but there's little impetus to funnel money into new research and development programs when the pressure to cut spending, especially from the conservative bloc, is so strong.