Where's the Sequester? Agencies Skirt Spending Cuts

PHOTO: A U.S. Border Patrol agent looks along a section of the recently-constructed fence at the U.S.-Mexico border on February 26, 2013 in Nogales, Arizona.

A month after the dreaded "sequester" kicked in, the nation has yet to feel some of its most-feared effects.

The White House has gone mostly silent about the sequester, after President Obama and agency heads spent much of February warning of dire consequences if automatic spending cuts were allowed to happen. But in a few select cases, agencies have managed to sidestep or delay some of the sequester's across-the-board budgetary pain.

They can thank Congress for some of the leeway.

READ MORE: What is Sequestration? D.C.'s Weird Idea of Cuts

Last Tuesday, President Obama signed a measure to keep the federal government funded through September 30, and it included provisions to cover over one of the sequester's more sensational pitfalls.

The nation will avoid a meat shortage, for instance, because Congress supplied $55 million in new money to UDSA's Food Safety and Inspection Service. Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack had warned Congress and a skeptical meat industry that, without congressional action, furloughs to inspectors would force meat and poultry producers to shut down. Without anyone to inspect their products, as required by law, livestock couldn't be slaughtered.

But Congress responded to the lobbying effort with funding that will prevent furloughs, USDA confirmed to ABC News.

Despite warnings of prison lockdowns and possible inmate violence, prisons will remain fully staffed.

READ MORE: Start of Sequester Foresees Harm Beyond Staff Cuts

Before the sequester took effect March 1, Attorney General Eric Holder predicted in a letter to the Senate Appropriations Committee that it would mean furloughs to Bureau of Prisons staff, adding that he was "acutely concerned about staff and inmate safety should cuts of the sequestration's magnitude hit BOP." With fewer corrections officers, prison safety might be compromised.

But the furloughs won't happen, after all. Holder used his "limited authority" to transfer $150 million of Justice Department money to BOP, he wrote to employees last month in a memo obtained by ABC News.

Furloughs to FBI agents were supposed to weaken U.S. defenses against terrorist cells, and furloughs to U.S. attorneys were supposed to cut criminal prosecutions by thousands - but those have been delayed. Holder announced in a separate memo that he will delay all decisions about furloughs until mid-April.

Cuts to Customs and Border Patrol were supposed to mean a more porous border with fewer agents guarding it. But CBP, too, has delayed furloughs, meaning border agents will stay on the job.

Congress and the new government-funding measure, again, get credit.

After the new funding measure, agencies will have until late April to craft new plans to implement sequester cuts.

"Although the budget reductions imposed by sequestration are significant, the bill's provisions allow CBP to mitigate to some degree the impacts of the reduced budget on operations and on CBP's workforce," Thomas S. Winkowski, CBP's deputy commissioner, wrote in a memo to employees on Monday, Univisoin reported.

All this amounts to a deferred impact. Some of the worst consequences were slated to begin in April, as furloughs to government workers cannot happen until 30 days after agencies notify their employees. At DoJ, for instance, those notices have not yet gone out. Where agency heads once said they had no flexibility to avoid the worst of the sequester's calamities, they've found it with some help from Congress.

  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like...