No Breakout Candidate at Democratic Debate

If you were looking for big fireworks or a knockout punch in the first Democratic presidential debate of the 2008 election cycle, you will no doubt be somewhat disappointed tonight. No one candidate seemed to dominate the field.

Though much of the coverage of the race thus far has been through a "Clinton vs. Obama" frame, the front runners were just two of eight candidates on the stage, and each got their chance to make their case. In fact, it was the two most unknown candidates representing the far left wing of the Democratic Party -- Rep. Dennis Kucinich, D-Ohio, and former Sen. Mike Gravel, R-Alaska -- who created the relatively little heat on the stage.

"And I got to tell you, after standing up with them, some of these people frighten me -- they frighten me," said Gravel about his opponents.

Iraq dominated more time than any other single issue, as the presidential hopefuls continued to differentiate themselves on the subject in what have now become familiar ways to the Democratic activists who have been closely following the campaign.

"I am proud that I opposed this war from the start," said Sen. Barack Obama, D-Ill., before pivoting to his support for a phased withdrawal plan.

"If I knew then what I now know, I would not have voted that way," said Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., in her usual refrain.

When asked about Clinton's refusal to apologize for her 2002 war authorization vote, former Sen. John Edwards, D-N.C., took the opportunity to throw a bit of an elbow her way.

"That is a question of conscience for Sen. Clinton or anyone else," said Edwards.

The North Carolinian making his second run for the White House also delivered a pointed line in Obama's direction later in the debate on the topic of health care.

"If you want to be president of the United States, to tell the American people what it is you want to do, rhetoric's not enough. High-falutin' language is not enough," said Edwards in a clear reference to what critics say is Obama's penchant for lofty ideas, but a lack of specifics.

However, Obama talked with ease and some detail about health care policy, for example, in an effort to show he is a candidate not just of style, but also of substance.

In one of moderator Brian Williams' more provocative questions of the evening about how the candidates would respond to a terrorist attack on two American cities, Obama first spoke about emergency response and then spoke of intelligence failures.

His answer was in marked contrast to those provided by Gov. Bill Richardson, D-N.M., and Sen. Joe Biden, D-Del., who began their responses with finding out who was responsible and responding with military action.

Obama appeared uncomfortable with his initial response and came back to the issue of terrorism to add some muscle to it later on.

"But one thing that I do have to go back on, on this issue of terrorism: We have genuine enemies out there that have to be hunted down, networks have to be dismantled," he said.

All the major candidates seemed to successfully follow the most important rule for debates -- do no harm. When asked to address what Williams called the "elephants in the room," the candidates appeared well prepared and didn't trip into the potential pitfalls.

Edwards dispatched a question about his $400 haircut with ease by again conceding that it was a mistake the campaign paid for the haircut and the mistake was "remedied."

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...