'This Week' Transcript: Jon Huntsman, Plus Analysis of the ABC News Iowa Debate


People want to know if they're going to have a president who's going to call for term limits for Congress. They want to know they're going to have a president who will take on banks that are too big to fail. And it doesn't matter if we fix taxes or create a more streamlined regulatory environment or move toward energy independence. If we're stuck with banks that are too big to fail, with this implied guarantee by the taxpayers, we're setting ourselves up for disaster.

So we've moved from zero to now double digits, and in the weeks ahead, I do believe we're going to move right up toward the top of the pack, understanding full well that people simply don't make decisions until days out, from in this case, January 10th.

I like our position. They want an honest, honorable, trustworthy person in this race. They want someone whose core they can trust going forward. We're putting ourselves forward as that person. And I like our position.

AMANPOUR: I just want to put up a graphic, because, again, talking about New Hampshire, you are back in fourth place there. So given how important New Hampshire is to you staying in the race, tell me honestly where you have to come in order to stay in the race?

HUNTSMAN: We have to beat market expectations, Christiane. And I have every expectation that we're going to beat market expectations.

AMANPOUR: Where is that, second, third? Where do you think you'd be?

HUNTSMAN: I'm not going to play the numbers game. I am not going to play the numbers game, but we're going to be right up toward the top. We have done nothing but climb in every poll since we entered this market, and our message is connecting with people. I can feel it on the ground. I have a very good visceral sense of where this campaign is going. And we're going to surprise and upend conventional wisdom, I can tell you that right now.

AMANPOUR: All right, let me ask you about where this campaign is going. I read to you a few comments from people before, including one who called you the sanest one still running. But it appears that you're reversing some of your own eminently sensible positions, for instance on climate change. You in August tweeted that "to be clear, I believe in evolution, and I trust scientists on global warming. Call me crazy." You have been tweeting about this sort of rightward swing, you've been jabbing at the base. And yet last week, you sort of rolled that bit back on climate change. You sort of said there isn't enough science. I mean, what are you doing?

HUNTSMAN: Well, Christiane, I'm not changing at all. I have said all along that I put my faith and trust in science. When you have 99 out 100 climate scientists, you have members of the National Academy of Sciences who have weighed in on a body of research on the subject matter, I say that's where I put my trust.

Yes, there might be one percent of scientists who still are questioning some of those assumptions, and that debate and discussion will continue. But as for me, let me make it crystal clear. I'm on the side of science in this debate. I don't know a whole lot of people on Capitol Hill who are physicists or climate scientists. I think this is a discussion that needs to be taken out of the political lane and kept in the science lane.

AMANPOUR: One more question, you have said that you will endorse and support whoever's the nominee. If it is Newt Gingrich, will he get your endorsement?

HUNTSMAN: Well, listen, I don't have to worry about that, because we're moving up in this great state of New Hampshire. We're going to be the nominee, and I don't have to worry about anything beyond that.

AMANPOUR: Jon Huntsman, thank you very much indeed for joining us.

HUNTSMAN: Thanks, Christiane.

AMANPOUR: And up next, the debate moment that sent the twitter-verse on fire. Our ABC correspondents on the ground in Des Moines on how the campaigns are responding to Mitt Romney's big bet.


AMANPOUR: Even as the candidates sparred on stage at last night's debate, social media was exploding with real-time reaction. To take the pulse of the Twitter-verse, we teamed up with Bluefin Lab, a social TV analytics company based in Cambridge, Massachusetts. They spent the night combing Twitter, and here is what they found. These animations powered by Bluefin Labs. Look at all the tweets about the ABC News debate. Some 236,000 of them. So which candidate got the most mentions? Mitt Romney, with 25 percent. And it was largely brought on by this moment. Watch.


PERRY: You know, I'm just saying. You were for individual mandates, my friend.

ROMNEY: You know what, you have raised that before, Rick and...

PERRY: It was true then. It was true now.

ROMNEY: Rick, I'll tell you what, 10,000 bucks. $10,000 bet.

PERRY: I'm not in the betting business.



AMANPOUR: That moment triggered a tweet frenzy. This graph shows the volume of debate commentary on Twitter, you can see the spike in yellow when Romney made that bet. The Fix commented, quote, "I bet you $10,000 Romney would like to take back that line right about now." And you can see how that was retweeted far and wide.

And so that's how the Romney bet reverberated online. But how did it play in the debate hall? And more importantly, how it will play on the campaign trail?

I want to bring in our ABC team in Des Moines. Chief White House correspondent Jake Tapper, senior political correspondent Jon Karl and the intrepid John Berman.

Let me go to you John Berman first, I bet that is the moment that Mitt Romney and his team want to take back, I would assume. How is it playing in the spin room?

JOHN BERMAN: Well, the morning the Romney campaign is claiming to me that it wasn't a gaffe. And they're making a two pronged response to the frenzy over it. They say number one, Mitt Romney was right. And on the facts, he probably would have won that bet. Rick Perry was misquoting Romney's comments in his book.

And the second spin that the Romney campaign is giving me is that it's only the Democrats who are making a big deal out of this $10,000 bet. And it just proves, so says the Romney campaign, that the Democrats are obsessed with Mitt Romney and it proves that Mitt Romney is the most electable candidate to kind of very complicated jujitsu they're playing here. And it may be a tough sale.

And of course it may not be a good thing that Mitt Romney was engaging with Rick Perry in the first place there. It sort of brings Mitt Romney down a little bit.

AMANPOUR: So, kind of it's a good thing.

Jake, is that right? Is it just the Democrats? Is it other Republicans who are now sort of trying to capitalize on it? Do you think too much attention is being paid to that bet comment?

JAKE TAPPER, ABC NEWS CORRESPONDENT: Well, I mean, probably in the scheme of all that matters of import that were debated last night, it probably is getting a little bit more than its fair share of attention. But I agree with the Romney's campaign argument that the Democrats are most focused on him, because they consider him to be the biggest threat to the re-election of President Obama. I think there's no question about that fact.

The Democrats put out a web video today attacking Newt Gingrich. The only problem is, it basically -- it calls Gingrich a three decades of Tea Party politics. It's basically an ad that could help Gingrich in a Republican primary. It could have been produced by Newt Gingrich. And the argument, of course, is that they would rather -- Democrats would rather face Newt Gingrich than face Mitt Romney. And I think that's a salient argument.

One thing about the $10,000 bet. I should fully disclose, one time I was interviewing Chris Van Hollen the chairman of the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee before the 2010 elections. And he said the Democrats were going to hold the House and I too offered a $10,000 bet to him. He did not take it.

So I know kind of what was going through his Mitt Romney's head. I don't have the wealth that Mitt Romney has, but I was...

BERMAN: You would have won that bet.

TAPPER: I would have won the bet.

AMANPOUR: In other words, anybody could do it.

TAPPER: ...made the bet.

My point was, I knew that I was right. Put $10,000 on the line. And I think that's what Romney was trying to do. Obviously, it doesn't...

AMANPOUR: It's a rhetorical flourish, so to speak in the betting world then you're saying.

Jon, so the spotlight of course was on Newt Gingrich, and everyone wants to know can he keep his cool, is he going to say something strange? Is he going to, you know, lose it? How did he stack up last night?

KARL: Well the first thing is he didn't bet anybody $10,000. We'll give him points there.


TAPPER: He has it, though.

KARL: The thing is, yeah, especially after all of those speeches. Look, the thing that Gingrich has going for him here is that in these debates, including last night, where he was the target of at tacks, he actually looked like the one that was the steadiest. I mean, look, Romney needs to have his boot to Gingrich's throat. He needs to show that Gingrich is temperamentally not fit to be president. He tried to do that rhetorically last night, but looking on the stage Gingrich was the steadiest. He was the most measured. He did not look like a guy who was about to fly off the handle.

TAPPER: And Christiane, the attacks that -- there is a lot to attack about the Gingrich record. I think even the Gingrich people would acknowledge that. But the attack that Romney leveled against him yesterday was just really poorly done. He could have gone after him on any number of policy issues including Gingrich's assailing of the Paul Ryan plan for Medicare, but instead he just recited a litany, a list. And Gingrich just shot them down one after the other. And I think Gingrich did himself a lot of good last night.

That said, when I went back out to the car after the debate, this was on my windshield. This is an attack flyer. And this is an example of what Gingrich is going to face over the next 23 days here in Iowa, a below the radar attack against everything he's ever done.

AMANPOUR: And that's kind of been going on ever since he sort of zoomed to the front-runner position.

So let's play another moment from the debate, sort of the elephant in the room.


STEPHANOPOULOS: Do you think a candidate that breaks his marital vows is more likely to break faith in voters?

PERRY: If you will cheat on your wife, if you will cheat on your spouse, why wouldn't you cheat on your business partner or why wouldn't you cheat on anybody for that matter?

SANTORUM: I think character issues do count. And I think all of your record, personal as well as political record, is there for the public to look at. I would not say it's a disqualifier. I wouldn't go that far. I think people make mistakes. And you are held accountable to those mistakes.

GINGRICH: And I think people have to render judgment. In my case, I have said up front, openly, I have made mistakes at times. I have had to god for forgiveness. I've had to seek reconciliation. But I'm also a 68-year-old grandfather and I think people have to measure who I am now and whether I'm a person they can trust.


AMANPOUR: So John, obviously, Newt Gingrich was prepared for that. Do you he diffused the issue? And can you all help me to understand how in a state that's socially conservative people seem to be rallying around a candidate with these kind of issues? John?

BERMAN: It was an uncomfortable -- it was an uncomfortable moment when they were going down the line of marital fidelity and everyone is all looking at Newt Gingrich out of the corner of their eye. But secretly and not so secretly, I think Newt is thrilled that it happened. It has now been asked and answered. He had a very smooth response. I thought he looked dignified. Callista in the audience there looked like she was agreeing with everything he was saying. So this was a very strong moment, I think, for Newt Gingrich.

And I think that the social conservatives here in Iowa who might care about it, either already do care about it or they have decided they don't. And they're making the candidates here. They're making a decision based on a number of different things. And these debates seem to be the one thing they're looking at more than any other. And Gingrich has just performed so well in them that they might be willing to look beyond this other issue that might otherwise drive their decision.

AMANPOUR: So Jon Karl, probably the only one who sort of made Gingrich really squirm a little bit was Ron Paul, particularly when he talked to him about the money, Freddie Mac, this and that. He had a strong night on that stage. He has got money, he has got the organization, could he pull off an upset, Ron Paul?

KARL: Yes. Ron Paul can win in Iowa.

Look, Ron Paul is the campaign here in Iowa that has the most energy. You saw it, you know, in my opening piece, I went to all of the campaign headquarters, the only one buzzing with activity is Ron Paul's. And when you see the events that are happening out here, you're not seeing big crowds at Romney's events, you're not seeing big crowds even at Gingrich events yet, but you are seeing huge crowds show up for Ron Paul.

So Iowa caucuses, there's now question Ron Paul could pull...

BERMAN: There was a key piece of spin from the Romney campaign at the debate last night. They went out of their way to say that Ron Paul had a great night. It seems as if they're saying right now, look, it's not going well for us, if we can't win, it better not be Newt Gingrich, let's build up Ron Paul.

TAPPER: There is a ceiling, though, Christiane, which is -- in the same way that Mitt Romney has a ceiling, Ron Paul has a ceiling which is he has a very energize, roughly 20 percent of the Republican base. And then after that, it's not just that the other 80 percent don't like him that much, they disagree with him.

Ron Paul is a pure consistent libertarian.

BERMAN: But that 20 percent is going to show up on caucus night. I mean, there could be a blizzard, there could be -- whatever...

TAPPER: And Mitt Romney will be driving them to the polls.

AMANPOUR: Again, according to the "New York Times" two-thirds of those who say they're going to go to the Iowa caucuses still say they haven't made up their minds.

Let me ask you, Jay, quickly about Rick Perry, Michele Bachmann, the two real social conservatives did they break out?

TAPPER: I think they both had decent nights, especially Michele Bachmann. And this is a state where in the past she has proven she can garner support. The question for them is over the next 23 days, can they be seen as credible? What are people going to be saying about them.

If their support starts to rise, if there is a poll that comes out that indicates either Perry or Bachmann is rising in the polls could be a contender. I could see people going to her, not in droves, but I could see her garnering support.

The support here for Gingrich, at least according to Iowans with whom I've spoken, they like him. They think he's experienced. They like his ideas. They don't like his personal life. They don't like the baggage that comes with that, or as one Iowan put it the luggage that he brings with him. And I think that that could undercut him ultimately, but right now he is still in a very strong position.

AMANPOUR: I like luggage.

All right, gentlemen, thank you very much indeed for joining us.

Up next what made Mitt Romney declare that he's not a bomb thrower? The most fiery exchange of last night's debate is coming up next. And George Will and the roundtable are here to discuss the campaign endgame with the Iowa caucus just 23 days away.



UNIDENTIFIED FEMALE: When was the last time you had a personal financial strain that forced you not only to give up a luxury but also to cut back on necessity?

PERRY: Didn't have running water until I was 5 or 6 years old.

PAUL: ...during the depression and World War II and we didn't have very much, and I worked my way through college.

SANTORUM: I can say that I grew up in a very modest home.

BACHMANN: We're still coupon clippers. We still go to consignment stores today.

GINGRICH: When I was young, we lived in an apartment above a gas station on the square in Homestown, Pennsylvania.

ROMNEY: I didn't grow up poor. And if somebody is looking for someone who has grown up with that background I'm not the person.


AMANPOUR: Another stand-out moment from last night's ABC News debate in Des Moines, Iowa. For the candidates on that stage, time is running short. The Iowa caucuses are just around the corner. And closer still, Christmas, a time when the political world goes into hibernation so breakout opportunities are now few and far between.

So let's bring in our roundtable. George Will, Republican strategist Leslie Sanchez, Democratic strategist Donna Brazile, and joining us from Iowa Des Moines Register columnist Kathy Obradovich.

Thank you for joining us.

George, did last night change the dynamic in the race?

GEORGE WILL, CONSERVATIVE COLUMNIST: It reinforced it in the sense that we now have a solid front-runner in Newt Gingrich. And he's arguing with Mitt Romney over who is the most electable. So it comes down to this right now with the clock ticking and as you say, favoring Newt Gingrich, Newt Gingrich was a shooting star in this town, the most prominent Republican from 1994 to 1998. He was at that point he was the most disliked politician in America. He says I'm the most electable

Mitt Romney said that he's the most electable. I refer people to Jonathan Last in the Weekly Standard today, says Mitt Romney has been in 22 contested elections, not counting caucuses -- primaries and general elections. He's won five. He has lost 17.

AMANPOUR: And yet you, George, have been saying that they should give a Jon Huntsman a serious, second look. I mean, you're not happy that are you that Gingrich is as you say now the solid front-runner.

WILL: I don't have a dog in this fight. I have a wife in this fight who is surprising...

AMANPOUR: Another conservative.

WILL: I do think that, in fact, if the clock allows enough time and the Republican rules have been changed to stretch this out, people are going to have to say we may need a third candidate.

AMANPOUR: Well, let's get that in a moment. Let me ask you, Donna, what do you think Mitt Romney and team Romney are thinking this morning after last night's performance?

DONNA BRAZILE, DEMOCRATIC STRATEGIST: Well, first of all he had a silver foot in his mouth moment with that $10,000 wager. And that comes on the heels of course making that comment months ago about $1,500 in payroll tax cuts as a little band aid. Mitt Romney's problem is that Mitt Romney doesn't know how to transition himself from a general election strategy where he was focused on President Obama to trying to appeal to the so-called self-identified Christian conservatives in the state of Iowa.

His other problem, of course, is that he doesn't really have a big organization on the ground. He's trying to play catch-up because his goal is not to come in fourth place.

Ron Paul has an organization. And George and I were talking in the green room, if there's a foot of snow and you have to get your people to the 1,600 precinct, guess what; Ron Paul will have a driver to bring you to those precincts.

AMANPOUR: So interesting. Let me bring in Kathie Obradovich from the Des Moines Register.

Kathie, what Donna just said and what we've been talking about, does -- do all of the indicators favor Ron Paul in Iowa right now?

OBRADOVICH: Ron Paul has a very strong campaign in Iowa. And you have to remember that he has the experience of having come in, in fifth place, in the Iowa caucuses four years ago. He -- his campaign never really went away. He kept a presence in the state for these last four years. He had key people on the state Republican Central Committee. So he has been building up to this for a long time.

Ron Paul has energized new caucusgoers. He energizes young caucusgoers. Now, typically, those are not the most reliable people to go to the caucuses. You usually want old, established people who are veterans of the caucuses. You know, 65-plus is usually the demographic that you want.

But Ron Paul has a unique ability to not only energize those people but inspire a lot of loyalty. So, yeah, he is in a very good place.

I won't -- I won't discount, though, Mitt Romney's organization. He's got an experienced crew and he has been working on his organization, even though the candidates...

AMANPOUR: Well, let me ask you about responding to Donna, evoking Ann Richards and what she said about George Bush, "silver foot in his mouth." This bet -- is that -- how is that going to play in Iowa?

OBRADOVICH: I think that Mitt Romney made a mistake there because it was a false note. It is an indicator to people that he's not quite like us. The average median income in Iowa is less than -- is less than $50,000 a year.

So a bet like that, $10,000, even though it was an off-the-cuff thing, it's one of those little false notes. And because Mitt Romney has not been here; he has not campaigned here in person; he has not made a personal connection with Iowans, that kind of thing matters.

AMANPOUR: Leslie, Newt Gingrich, solid front-runner, good for your party? And does he have the organization to turn into a win in Iowa?

SANCHEZ: Organization -- lot of people would say it's not there yet. The question about him is does he have the intensity and passion in those caucusgoers, in those early primary voters. We don't really know. Is it still that soft level of support?

The interesting thing about him, if you go back to Newt Gingrich in the 1990s, he said he was the only true revolutionary. And that was what he hearkened to. And he said he was somebody who took on Bill Clinton at the height of his popularity. He had welfare reform -- it took three times to do it; telecommunications reform, he battled on; truth in sentencing.

There were a lot of things and markers and milestones that he's using now to say that he is that revolutionary candidate.

AMANPOUR: And do you think, like many in the Republican establishment, that, despite their records of winning and losing, Mitt Romney and Newt Gingrich, that Gingrich might not be as electable in a general election against Obama? Do you think that's a problem?

SANCHEZ: It -- there is a strong possibility that he will do the foot-in-mouth disease that we've seen with other contenders. It's a long road to get to next November, many possibilities. And he speaks his mind, and it's not so eloquent. And sometimes it's a very abrasive tone.

WILL: Mitt Romney has another problem, and that is he has -- he might be in the position that Dick Gephardt was in, in 2004, in Donna's party. Howard Dean came in and surged to the top. Dick Gephardt had to take him down, so he went negative, and he certainly raised Howard Dean's negatives, but he also raised his own while doing that, and John Kerry right up the middle, again, your third candidate.

AMANPOUR: Talking about some of the things Newt Gingrich says, of course we are all focusing because he is the front-runner, and we want to know how this is going to play out. He does say some pretty alarming things, some might say outrageous things. He said this week that the Palestinians were an invented people. And it came up in the debate last night, no surprise. Let's listen.


GEORGE STEPHANOPOULOS, ABC NEWS: Do you agree with that characterization, that the Palestinians are an invented people?

REP. RON PAUL, R-TEXAS: No. I don't agree with that. And that's just stirring up trouble.

Technically and historically, yes, you know, under the Ottoman Empire, the Palestinians didn't have a state, but neither did Israel have a state, then, too.

FORMER REP. NEWT GINGRICH, R-GA., PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: Was what I said factually correct? Yes. Is it historically true? Yes. Somebody ought to have the courage to tell the truth. These people are terrorists. They teach terrorism in their schools. It's fundamentally time for somebody to have the guts to stand up and say enough lying about the Middle East.

FORMER GOV. MITT ROMNEY, R-MASS., PRESIDENTIAL CANDIDATE: I happen to agree with most of what the speaker said, except by going out and saying the Palestinians are an invented people. That, I think, was a mistake on the speaker's part. You -- you'd -- I think the speaker would probably suggest that as well. I don't think we want to...



ROMNEY: Maybe not -- I...



AMANPOUR: No, he didn't want to take it back. And he ratcheted it up. He doubled down and basically called the whole Palestinian people terrorists.

So do you think that this is going to be a problem for him as he goes forward, these kind of statements?

Look, he's out of step with not only the Israeli leadership but the U.S. leadership and -- any everybody on this issue.

WILL: There is a difference between pedantry and prudence, and he was erring on the side of pedantry here.

That said, I'm not sure this will hurt him. What all people take away from that is he's read his history, and that's fine. And it reinforces his -- his position as the House intellectual, smartest man in the room, all that other stuff.

BRAZILE: No, it's pandering. It's pandering. It's absolute pandering.

More than a third of the caucusgoers are Christian evangelicals. They are very supportive of Israel. And Newt Gingrich understands that, while historically, maybe incorrect; diplomatically, terrible, this is about pandering to that base.

AMANPOUR: And it is historically incorrect. Because, you know, way in the 1800s, they were called the Palestinians.

But here's the point. The point is that that kind of brashness, that kind of conviction, is playing -- is playing, so isn't that a worry, for instance, for -- for your party?

BRAZILE: You know, if Newt Gingrich didn't have 35 years of both carry-on luggage as well as stored luggage -- he was remorseful last night. I thought he did a good job. Look, I'm Catholic. I believe in forgiveness. I won't render judgment. He showed last night he could take a punch; he can give a punch.

But the bottom line is, is that he brings a lot of baggage. And I think Republicans want somebody who is not only able to articulate that anger but beat President Obama. And Newt Gingrich cannot beat President Obama.

AMANPOUR: Let me go back to Kathie Obradovich in -- in Des Moines, there.

Michele Bachmann had a strong night. She did the whole Newt-Romney mantra. And she's obviously trying to play to the social conservatives. Is it too late for her? I mean, having done so well in the Ames straw poll, is it too late for a comeback?

OBRADOVICH: Michele Bachmann can come back, but she needs some pretty extraordinary things to happen in the next few weeks. She basically has to really unite the religious conservatives. That means that she's got to knock out Rick Perry, Rick Santorum, who has spent more time in Iowa than anybody else.

And she's got to really convince the religious conservatives that Newt Gingrich is not the guy. In fact, Newt Gingrich is drawing substantial support from social conservatives and religious conservatives, as well as a spectrum of Iowa caucusgoers.

But there is -- he has enemies. And the Samsonite, the luggage, the baggage, those kinds of things do not play well with certain evangelical groups that would like to promote somebody else.

The problem is that those groups, along with religious conservatives generally, cannot decide who they like better. So in the absence of -- if Michele Bachmann is that person, she could do well. But she has not done it so far.

WILL: All this demonstrates is that some of the interesting wrinkles out there. You talk about how the evangelicals in Iowa want to defend Israel. That puts -- that hurts Ron Paul, who doesn't want to defend much of anything.


On the other hand, according to FEC reports, Federal Election Commission, in the third quarter, Ron Paul got more contributions from active-duty military than the other Republican candidates combined.

BRAZILE: Well, look, Ron Paul won only one Southern county in the 2008 caucuses; 119,000 people showed up. If Ron Paul can enlarge the caucus electorate, get more voters to register that note as Republicans, Ron Paul can be what I call the X factor that night.

SANCHEZ: But we know Ron Paul's not going -- his caucusgoers are not going to be -- or they will dissuaded in terms of other candidates.

But I want to go back to Bachmann. Because I thought that was interesting. She worked very hard, visited all 99 counties, but that -- tying herself to Cain so transparently did not help.

AMANPOUR: Very quickly, George, Jon Huntsman thinks he's going to do well in New Hampshire. Is he?

WILL: It's going to be hard to do that because the Iowa results are going to be so interesting in imparting momentum to everyone but him.

BRAZILE: Bachmann needs to come in fourth place. She doesn't have to win.

BRAZILE: All right. And this conversation will continue in the green room. We will have that, of course, on abcnews.com/thisweek.

And coming up next, the Sunday funnies and a look at what you can expect next week in politics.


AMANPOUR: And now, the "Sunday Funnies."


DAVID LETTERMAN, HOST, "THE LATE SHOW": They say that Newt is tremendous negotiator, tremendous debater, well, you know, of course he has got three ex-wives.


STEPHEN COLBERT, HOST, "THE COLBERT REPORT": Herman Cain suspended his campaign. That is a shame. He touched so many people.


CONAN O'BRIEN, HOST, "CONAN": A reporter for FOX News said that he saw the new Muppet movie and he found it to be left-wing communist propaganda, I think he may have a point.

UNIDENTIFIED MALE: Well, all right!




UNIDENTIFIED MALE: It's Stalin's drumstick!



AMANPOUR: And now for a look at what's on tap next week in politics.

Mitt Romney heads back to New Hampshire today, stumping there all week to try to hold on to his lead in the "first in the nation" primary. On Monday, Jon Huntsman steps into Newt Gingrich's front-runner spotlight, joining him for a Lincoln-Douglas-style debate in Manchester. Rick Perry kicks off a multi-day Iowa bus tour on Wednesday, traveling through Council Bluffs, Harlan, and Denison. And on Thursday, all of the GOP candidates meet again for a FOX News debate in Sioux City.

"In Memoriam" is next. We'll be right back.


AMANPOUR: And now, "In Memoriam."


HARRY MORGAN, ACTOR: I'm the friendly neighborhood cop. Well, that's like being lord mayor. Everybody brings their troubles to you.

JACK WEBB, ACTOR: Yes, I noticed that.

MORGAN: In most cases, all you can do is listen.

Sophie, this ain't easy for me to tell you, but I can't take you home with me. I sure will miss you. And I have a feeling you'll miss me, too, won't you?




AMANPOUR: And we remember all of those who died in war this week. The Pentagon released the names of four soldiers killed in Afghanistan.

We'll be right back.


AMANPOUR: That's our program this week, be sure to watch "World News" with David Muir tonight for all of the latest headlines.

And join us next weekend for a special program, "The Great American Debate," presented in partnership with the University of Virginia's Miller Center. Political heavyweights square off on the conservative rallying cry against the president. "There's too much government in my life," it's a debate that affects everything. Congressman Paul Ryan teams up with George Will versus Congressman Barney Frank and former Clinton Labor Secretary Robert Reich.

We'll see you then.


Join the Discussion
blog comments powered by Disqus
You Might Also Like...