Donald Sterling's motion denied

Ruttenberg repeatedly objected to Platzer's testimony as a violation of his client's right to privacy. He argued that since Sterling was not aware the examinations were to evaluate his mental competency and could later be used to exclude him from the family trust which owned the Clippers, the provisions of the trust in which each of the Sterlings waived their right to privacy (under federal HIPAA laws) if they were deemed incapable of handling their legal or business affairs were not applicable.

"He was totally unaware that the examination was anything other than his wife's concern for his health. I think Dr. Platzer confirmed that," Ruttenberg said. "She was there to examine him from a neurological standpoint, to determine what his mental status was. She had no knowledge of the existence of the trust. She had no knowledge of the removal provision. We don't think that was brought to her attention until about a week after the exam. We have a concern as to the manner in which this was conducted, between Plan A and Plan B ... the secret Plan B."

Levanas overruled Ruttenberg's objections and asked if there was a way to avoid him objecting on the same grounds throughout the trial. Ruttenberg laughed and said he planned to object every time Sterling's medical information was discussed, which he did throughout Platzer's testimony.

Platzer was also asked by O'Donnell whether she had social interaction with Shelly and Donald Sterling after the exam, as had been alleged in previous court filings. His attorneys contend that social interaction, at the Polo Lounge inside the Beverly Hills Hotel, compromised the findings of her exam.

Dr. Platzer testified she and Shelly Sterling had dinner at the Polo Lounge, which is across the street from the Sterlings' home, after the exam. She said she drank about a half of a glass of wine during dinner, and that Donald Sterling, Samini (who hadn't yet been retained as his attorney) and a friend of Donald's named Lawrence later joined them, but that Shelly had "discouraged them" from sitting at their table.

Platzer said she and Samini spoke about their personal lives, but denied she had gotten emotional at any point during dinner, as Sterling's attorneys alleged in court papers.

She flatly denied that anything said or done during dinner impacted her evaluation of Donald Sterling, saying "absolutely not" when pressed on that issue by O'Donnell.

The judge recessed the trial during Platzer's testimony. She will be cross-examined Tuesday by Samini.

At some point in the afternoon, Donald Sterling is expected to be called as a witness, and he is to be questioned by Bert Fields, a legendary entertainment attorney.

"We're very anxious to get Mr. Sterling here because he's the guy that keeps doing everything he can to keep his family from getting the $2 billion they are entitled to," Fields said. "Why? Just because of his ego.

"He's accusing his wife of fraud. Nonsense. There's no fraud here. He knows better and we'll be able to show that."

-- This embed didnt make it to copy for story id = 24459782. -- This embed didnt make it to copy for story id = 24459782.
Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...