The Cell Phone Will See You Now

Pagers have been as synonymous with the medical community as scrubs, stethoscopes and lab coats.

But cell phones -- their electronic cousins -- have historically been persona non grata with the hospital set.

Electromagnetic interference from cell phones and other transmitting communication devices was thought to affect the performance of medical equipment.

Now, as technology improves, more hospitals in the United States and the United Kingdom are relaxing and lifting long-standing bans on cell phones.

But though the door is unlocked, it's not swinging all the way open. Experts caution that though the interference risks are low, they are still significant enough to warrant some limitations on cell phone use in health-care facilities.

Mayo Study Dispels Myth

In 2007, researchers at the Rochester, Minn.-based Mayo Clinic published one of the first reports to dispel the widespread notion that cell phones negatively affect patient care equipment.

Previous tests in 1997 and 2000 found that cell phones, especially older analog phones, could interfere with heart monitoring equipment and other sensitive medical instruments. In one case, a cell phone signal caused a ventilator to shut off.

But the most recent tests, on medical equipment better shielded against interference from wireless communication devices, showed researchers that the threat had dimmed.

In five months, the researchers performed 300 tests in patient rooms and determined that the normal use of cell phones resulted in no noticeable interference with medical equipment.

"When we watched the monitors, we didn't see anything that seemed clinically significant," Jeff Tri, one of the authors of the cell phone study, told ABCNews.com.

Those results -- combined with patient requests for cell phone use and the difficulty in enforcing a total ban -- not only persuaded the hospital to change its policy, but prompted it to encourage other hospitals to do the same.

"We said we don't think the incidence of interference is great enough to warrant the policy staying where it is," Tri said, adding that the two exceptions to the policy were the surgery and pediatric and neonatal units, as studying those areas would have required a different process.

Though Rare, Cell Phone Interference Still Real Threat

Noting the receding threat, earlier this year, health officials in the United Kingdom gave hospitals the go-ahead to relax their cell phone restrictions.

"Close support and comfort from loved ones when you are in hospital is essential. Mobile phones are commonplace in everyday life and people have told us they'd like to be able to use their phones in hospital to keep in touch," Ben Bradshaw, the U.K. health minister, said upon issuing the guidance.

But health-care technology experts continue to caution that cell phones are not entirely free of risk.

"We would be concerned that the [U.K.] decision creates an impression that cell phone interference with medical equipment doesn't exist. And though it's rare, interference events do occur," said James Keller, vice president of health technology evaluation and safety for the ECRI Institute. ECRI is a nonprofit organization that tests medical devices and provides guidance to hospitals.

When the Mayo Clinic study emerged, ECRI issued a similar statement, emphasizing that Mayo's research was not comprehensive enough to prompt a change to its cell phone position.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...