Will 'Transnationalists' Redefine What It Means to Be American?

The United States is often described as a "melting pot" that absorbs immigrants from diverse lands and blends them into something we call Americans. They may be Latin, or Russian, or Italian when they arrive, but given enough time they, or at least their children, become just like the rest of us.

That may have been true in the past, but it is less so today, according to a growing body of research. Modern technology ranging from jet aircraft to the Internet has made it possible for new immigrants to hang on to their past, and what we see is not necessarily what we get.

They are called "transnationals," a new buzzword that has embroiled many experts in controversy. The experts can't even seem to agree on its definition, much less whether it is a good thing.

But few dispute that something very fundamental has changed. It's different from internationalism, which chiefly concerns global commerce, in that transnationals are immigrants, or their offspring, who maintain a very personal relationship with the land and the culture from whence they came.

As their numbers grow many other things will change, including what it means to be a nation.

"The era of nation-state societies successfully keeping themselves distinct has now been eclipsed," sociologists Roger Waldinger and David Fitzgerald of the University of California, Los Angeles, concluded in a recent study.

But that doesn't mean America is any less, just because the country has a growing number of residents who feel loyal to both the United States and the country of their family's origin, says Elizabeth Stone of Fordham University, who has spent decades studying the stories of families who immigrated to this country in search of a new life.

It's a personal issue for her. Her grandparents came from Sicily, and she has found much evidence that they were driven to assimilate in the grand tradition of the melting pot.

"One of the best stories was how my grandmother named the family cats George Washington and Abraham Lincoln," because she wanted to be known as American, Stone says.

"My grandfather died in 1930 when my mother was 12, and he was held up as the model of what not to become," adds Stone, a professor of English and communication at Fordham. "He made my grandmother drop out of night school. He had a bunch of garages he rented out, and he wrote on those garages 'no smok.'"

The message in that is that "if you come here you become an American, you learn English, and you move ahead," she says.

Fast forward to a recent day when Stone sat in her office with three undergraduates -- one Cuban, one Russian, and one Greek -- who had joined with her in a research project on transnationalism. The results of that project were published in the current issue of Family Process.

All three students identified themselves as transnationals, meaning they maintained the language, culture, and ties to their roots, as well as a loyalty to the United States, where they now live. They were mulling over a question when one of them, Jane Lipnitsky, 22, a Russian Jew, whipped out her cell phone.

"My mom will know," she said, and within minutes was talking in Russian to her mother, who was visiting relatives in Russia.

That incident underscored all that has changed in recent years. It's now possible for people to bridge many gaps, both electronically and personally.

This monumental change began with "the jet," Stone says, and expanded into international communications and the Internet.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...