Accused Duke lacrosse player Reade Seligmann's lawyers have said he's innocent of the rape allegations made by an exotic dancer. They say he has an alibi.
On Monday, those statements were put into writing at the Durham County Courthouse.
On Monday, J. Kirk Osborn, Seligmann's attorney, filed three new motions on his behalf -- all strongly worded and all with big implications for the indicted sophomore's part in the Duke lacrosse rape investigation. After submitting the documents, Osborn declined media requests for comment.
In two of those motions, Seligmann's lawyers asked for detailed personal information about the alleged victim. They requested, among other things, personal, medical and educational records of the accuser, and criminal records or "bad acts" committed by any witnesses the prosecution planned to call to the stand.
"This request is based on the fact that the complaining witness has a history of criminal activity and behavior, which includes alcohol abuse, drug abuse and dishonesty, all conduct which indicate mental, emotional and/or physical problems, which affect her credibility as a witness," the defense said in court papers.
The two longer motions by Seligmann's lawyer -- they take up 23 of the 25 pages he filed in court Monday -- requested the accuser's detailed personal information. Among the items requested were her medical, mental health, and substance abuse treatment records.
The motions also requested information about any contact she had with the Department of Social Services Agencies, Probation and Parole, Child Protective Services Agencies, and other government branches. The motions also cite her prior arrest record, a possible history of mental problems, and the fact that there's more than one version of her rape story.
In addition, Seligmann's defense team requested her educational records from North Carolina Central University and Hillside High School, including any disciplinary action.
Why so much personal information? The defense said her accusations were only as strong as her word.
Legal scholars, rape specialists, and victims' rights advocates think the requests for personal information are unfair and unacceptable.
"It sounds like the strategy is to put the victim on trial and to stop questioning whether the defendants are guilty and instead to question whether the victim is guilty," said former Westchester County, N.Y., District Attorney Jeanine Pirro.
Compared to other criminal investigations, there is a double standard in rape cases, Pirro said.
"You never see [this kind of request] with any other victim but a sex crimes victim in the criminal justice system. … The victim ends up being the one on trial," she said.
Other lawyers, including North Carolina defense lawyer and former law professor David Rudolf, believe information about one's personal history should be part of what a jury takes into account.