Drew Peterson Jury Says Hearsay Convinced Them to Convict

Sept. 7, 2012— -- Eleven members of the Drew Peterson jury were convinced by the end of the first day of deliberations that the former cop had murdered his wife, despite the absence of physical evidence or eyewitnesses tying him to the crime.

According to Eduardo Saldana, the foreman of the Joliet, Ill., jury that convicted Peterson on Thursday of first-degree murder, the group quickly coalesced around the idea that Kathleen Savio was murdered.

"When the deliberations began, we first talked about what the doctors had to say, and we pretty much all agreed that it was a homicide. We did not think the death was accidental. After that it was just getting things right," Saldana, 22, told reporters at a juror press conference today.

The case revolved around the fact the Savio's 2004 death was initially categorized as accidental after she was found dead in her bathtub. It was only in 2007, when Peterson's fourth wife, Stacy, mysteriously disappeared, that police exhumed Savio's body and reexamined it. Forensic experts changed their findings to death by homicide and police charged Peterson. He has not been charged in the case of Stacy, who is still missing.

Juror Teresa Mathews said that the jury had their own theories about how Peterson might have killed Savio, though they said they would never know for sure.

"We have some theories about how it could have happened. She was grabbed from behind, and could have possibly stuck her head under bathroom sink and got that big gash on the back of her head. Otherwise she was drowned in the toilet, and broke both clavicles in toilet," Mathews said.

The jurors said that the most convincing testimony was hearsay statements allowed into evidence under a new law, known as "Drew's Law," named after Peterson. Prosecutors successfully fought to have statements made by Stacy Peterson and Savio to acquaintances admitted into evidence.

Drew and Stacy Peterson had begun dating and were living together at the time of Savio's death in 2004, while Savio and Drew were divorcing. Stacy made statements to her pastor and, later, to a divorce attorney about Drew's behavior the weekend Savio died.

It was the testimony of Stacy Peterson's pastor, Rev. Neil Schori, and her divorce attorney, Harry Smith, that was most important to the jury, Saldana said. Stacy Peterson told Schori that she woke up in the middle of the night and could not find Drew, and that he later showed up near the washing machine in their home, with women's clothing.

"When Stacy couldn't find him, and he showed up by the washing machine with women's clothing and told her she was going to be interviewed by police, that was kind of key evidence," Mathews said.

"One thing Drew said when he was going up the stairs [that night] was, 'they're going to think I did it.' That kind of confirmed it for us," Saldana added.

"The hearsay was the biggest part about this," Saldana said. "Neil Schori opened things up, but the lawyer's testimony was the thing that got us the most."

Saldana also said that the jury was distrustful of the police officers who initially investigated Savio's death and ruled that it was an accident. Drew Peterson was a Bolingbrook, Ill., police sergeant at the time of Savio's death.

"We thought any death should be investigated fully, that they should take their time. From the testimony, it was 10, 20 minutes that (the death investigator) was at the scene before he left, and we felt that was really wrong," Saldana said.

Mathews said that when the jury first began deliberations, seven people were convinced of Peterson's guilt, four jurors thought he was not guilty, and one was undecided. They said the disagreements mainly revolved around how to treat the hearsay statements. The group then asked the judge to have the hearsay testimony reread to them.