Pastor Faces Murder Charge in 2013 Fatal Fight

PHOTO: California youth pastor Robert Cox, 35, has been charged with murder in a fatal fight that happened in Las Vegas in June 2013.
Share
Copy

A California youth pastor faces murder charges after a man he fought with in a sports bar parking lot died of a head injury.

Robert Cox, 35, was released on $100,000 bail Monday after being charged in connection with a June 2013 fight.

Cox, a married father of two, was leading a ministry trip last year and passing through Las Vegas when his group stopped for a late-night dinner at a sports bar. Witnesses said they were in the parking lot when 55-year-old businessman Link Ellingson approached the group, aggressively starting a fight.

Cox pushed Ellingson down to protect his parishioners, witnesses said.

“Our pastor Rob defended his family and he acted in self-defense and really saved my life,” said Kelli Lane, who witnessed the incident.

Ellingson hit his head on the pavement, subsequently slipping into a coma. He died six months later, leaving his family devastated.

“I’ve never had such heartbreak that I had that day,” said his niece, Jayna Hardy. “He was the best uncle ever to all of his nieces and nephews. He has one great-nephew, two great-nieces, and then 13 nieces and nephews.”

“It was important to us for people to know how awesome and memorable my uncle was,” she continued. “He was funny. He was an entertainer, he was a giver. He was the person you would meet in line at the grocery store and he would invite you over for a barbecue at the end of the afternoon.”

Julie Cox, the pastor’s wife, said he never meant to hurt Ellingson.

“I believe wholeheartedly that my husband is innocent,” she said.

But investigators aren’t buying it. The coroner ruled the death a homicide, with prosecutors alleging in court documents that Cox actually hit the man “with premeditation and deliberation ... punching ... Link Ellingson in the face.”

ABC News Chief Legal Affairs Anchor Dan Abrams said the case will hinge on intent and necessity.

“This is a self-defense case, and so the crucial questions are going to be: Was the victim actually the aggressor? And did the defendant need to do what he did to protect himself?” Abrams said.

Join the Discussion
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...