Last week in Iowa, Haley made history as the first Republican woman to win more than one delegate in the Iowa caucuses — she finished with eight. Haley is just the fourth Republican woman to win any primary delegates at all (the others are Carly Fiorina in 2016, Michele Bachmann in 2012, and Margaret Chase Smith in 1964). To put that into perspective, three Republican men won delegates in Iowa last week.
Today in New Hampshire, Haley will likely make more history by adding to her delegate count (though she’s still most likely to come in second to Trump in the state). But running for the presidency as a woman presents unique challenges, and running for the Republican nomination is arguably even more complicated. For one, the GOP is less outwardly committed to electing women. According to a 2023 Pew survey, 75 percent of Democrats, but only 29 percent of Republicans, say there are too few women in politics. In that same survey, only 14 percent of Republicans (versus 57 percent of Democrats) said it was somewhat extremely important to them that the U.S. elect a female president in their lifetime. If Haley continues to present a challenge to Trump, his campaign might start exploiting his gender advantage.
Republican women may also face higher hurdles and harsher scrutiny from those within their own party: According to a 2022 poll from PerryUndem, 28 percent of Republican men and 20 percent of Republican women (compared to 10 percent of Democratic men and 1 percent of Democratic women) said that men generally make better political leaders than women. In a Republican electoral context, a candidate discussing how her experience as a woman enhances her leadership abilities risks putting off voters who prefer stereotypically male leadership traits or who shy away from “identity politics.” But ignoring those experiences can hurt their chances too, because Republicans have more traditional beliefs about women’s roles. It’s been a tough needle for Haley to thread.
Another hurdle that women running for the presidency face, regardless of their party, is questions about their “electability,” whatever that means. In the 2020 Democratic primary there was no shortage of think pieces and polls about Elizabeth Warren’s and Kamala Harris’s electability, particularly after Clinton’s loss to Trump in 2016 (e.g., “Warren battles the ghosts of Hillary”), when sexism undoubtedly played a role. When Haley announced she was running, Trump made a swipe that she is “overly ambitious,” a trope often weaponized against women who seek all kinds of power and authority, and she has faced other subtle attacks that invoke her gender.
Overall, the electability discussion seems to be plaguing Haley less than it did the women in the 2020 Democratic primary. But she’s still guarding against it. That’s why Haley, in her closing Iowa speech, claimed she would beat Biden by 17 points in the general election (a number she advertises often, including in her latest ad, “Haley wins, Trump loses”). That number comes from a Wall Street Journal poll from last year. But as Elliott mentioned during the Iowa the live blog last week, a 538 preliminary general-election polling average as of that night found Haley up by only 2.7 points versus Biden, and Trump ahead of Biden by 1.8 points). So, her electability argument is slimmer, but still standing. She just has to get by Trump to test it out.
—Meredith Conroy, 538 contributor