March 4, 2013 -- How are a vegan in Brooklyn, a journalist in Britain, an indigenous farmer in the Bolivian highlands and a migrant worker in Lima connected? One word: Quinoa. The popularity of this Andean "super food," which is pronounced keen-wa, has skyrocketed. The speed of its uptake, however, has not been without problems, highlighting the interconnections that exist in a global economy.
It sounds pretty great until we get to the quinoa boom's unintended negative consequences.
An anti-quinoa op-ed by a British journalist in The Guardian, for instance, called the quinoa trade "yet another troubling example of a damaging north-south exchange, with well-intentioned health and ethics-led consumers here unwittingly driving poverty there."
While most of this article is "rubbish", as they say across the pond, the controversy raises an important issue about global food chains: These days, a decision we make in one country can have effects halfway across the world.
According to the UN and other experts, while its price has risen, quinoa sold in traditional markets in rural areas is still accessible. Quinoa eaters in cities like Lima do face higher prices and don't see any of the benefits of the boom in foreign demand. But both the Peruvian and Bolivian governments are working to incorporate quinoa into public programs like school breakfasts.
The second argument is that the increased demand is causing a rapid expansion of quinoa production, which is damaging the environment. Recently, the Bolivian government admonished quinoa farmers for planting in areas where llamas once grazed — apparently llama manure is a key part of quinoa fertilization — and for depleting soils by not properly rotating crops. The lack of llama manure in larger farms is leading to an increase in chemical fertilizers, and poor crop management is causing desertification in some areas. These are the real downsides of the quinoa boom, though it is worth noting that foods we eat more commonly, like pork and beef, have a much greater impact on the environment (and much less benefit for Andean farmers).
What the controversy does get right is that our everyday habits and purchases are affecting people and communities well beyond our borders. The Brooklyn vegan who is buying up box after box of quinoa is improving their diet and boosting the incomes of Andean farmers and their families. But they are also affecting the environment and may be making it more difficult for a worker in Lima or La Paz to afford a food he grew up eating. Additionally, if a British journalist writes a misleading op-ed about how consumption of quinoa is driving poverty in Bolivia, it can, if not debunked, set off a chain of detrimental effects implicating all of the actors mentioned above.
This is a fact of life in today's globalized world. We are all connected, whether by quinoa, the beef we eat, the fuel we put in our cars or the phones we buy, and we have a responsibility to educate ourselves and make the right choices.