Why the Vaccine Debate Is Unlikely to Land in the Courtroom

Parents could sue over anti-vaxxers, but it might not work.

ByABC News
February 6, 2015, 1:34 PM

— -- As the measles virus spreads along with the tension over whether parents should vaccinate their children, it’s unlikely any confrontations will extend beyond the playground and into the courtroom, lawyers say.

The parent of a child who caught measles from a purposefully unvaccinated child could sue, but it would be hard to win, George Annas, who chairs the department of health law and bioethics at Boston University, said.

"I think you could make an argument that you have a moral responsibility, but it would be extremely difficult to argue this as a tort case," he said.

"As long as you're following state law, it's almost inconceivable that any court would say you're responsible for something that has been sanctioned by your state."

Sara Rosenbaum, a health law and policy professor at George Washington University, said a prosecutor would have to show the child was injured by measles, prove that the nonvaccinating parents caused the other child's measles, and show that they had a duty to protect other children from their unvaccinated child but breached that duty.

Both cause and duty would be most difficult to prove, she said. The measles is so contagious -- spreading to an average of 18 people for every one infected person -- that it would be hard to say who got the virus from whom.

Also, Annas said, the parents of the child too young or unable to get the measles vaccine for medical reasons may have more of a duty to keep their child away from unvaccinated children, putting some of the blame on them.

Rosenbaum said, "It doesn't work because once you allow individuals to make choices on all sides -- whether to immunize or not immunize, take your child to school or not -- you get into the murky world of tort litigation."That's why this issue is really a public health issue."

But bioethicist Arthur Caplan of the NYU Langone Medical Center in Manhattan said parents who choose not to vaccinate their children should be held responsible for the consequences of their actions.

Most states allow vaccine exemptions for medical and religious reasons, but 19 of them allow vaccine exemptions for philosophical reasons, meaning parents can simply choose not to vaccinate their children because they don't want to do it. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention has reported 102 confirmed measles cases in 14 states at last count on Monday, but several babies have since been diagnosed, including five on Thursday at a Chicago-area day care.

"Even if the government says you can opt out, if a kid who's got the measles brings it to a day care center and sickens or kills my newborn baby, of course I have the right to sue you, and I should," Caplan said.

He likened the situation to an accidental gun death. If a person has the right to own a gun and leaves it on a table, and a neighboring child picks it up and shoots himself, Caplan said, the gun owner is responsible for what happened.