'Potty Parity' Bill to End Some Long Ladies' Room Lines

Lawmakers want the government to ensure potty parity in federal buildings.

ByABC News
May 12, 2010, 9:31 AM

WASHINGTON, May 12, 2010 -- For most women, long waits to use restroom facilities in public buildings, sports arenas, theaters and airports are a familiar if not uncomfortable and exasperating reality.

Some even see disparities in the number of men's and women's toilets as a lingering form of gender discrimination from decades past.

Now Congress hopes "potty parity" legislation can provide some much needed relief to the bladders of women and children nationwide, at least those who visit or work in new federal government buildings. The bill would require an equal number of toilets for each gender.

"Holding it in can take its toll," Kathryn Anthony, an architecture professor at the University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign and expert on "gender issues in design," told a House panel considering the bill today.

"Emergencies happen," she said. "Accidents happen. Urinary tract infections happen. Delaying voiding can result in serious medical conditions. It is now time for our federal government to act."

Rep. Edolphus Towns, D-N.Y., Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., and other lawmakers want the government to require all newly constructed or leased federal buildings to have equal restroom facilities for women and men.

The so-called "Potty Parity" bill would end what they call the "unfathomable" discrimination women face by the infrastructure disparities in their workplaces.

The average American uses a toilet more than half a dozen times a day, nearly 3,000 times a year, and, all told, will spend up to two years of an entire life in the restroom.

"It's very troubling that you may be more likely to see in federal buildings women waiting in line for a restroom than you are to see them on the floor of the Senate," said Erin Matson, spokeswoman for the National Organization for Women, which supports the bill.

Experts say fewer toilets for women today largely reflect a previous era when women weren't as prominent in the workforce. It's a lingering reminder, Anthony said, of a "subtle yet powerful form of gender discrimination."