Framers intended Congress to convict former officials: Raskin
Breaking the silence in the chamber after playing out the managers' first video, lead House impeachment manager Rep. Jamie Raskin said, "If that's not an impeachable offense, then there is no such thing."
Raskin also made an appeal to senators' interest in defending the prerogatives of the legislative branch: If they acquit Trump, they will be ceding power to the executive branch.
"If the president's arguments for a January exception are upheld, then even if everyone agrees that he's culpable for these events, even if the evidence proves, as we think it definitively does, that the president incited a violent insurrection on the day Congress met to finalize the presidential election, he would have you believe there is absolutely nothing the Senate can do about it. No trial, no facts. He wants you to decide that the Senate is powerless at that point. That can't be right," he said.
Citing the impeachment of Warren Hastings in the Parliament of Great Britain, Raskin said the Framers of the Constitution supported impeaching former officials. He also said the power of Congress to impeach, convict and disqualify a president from holding future office are needed the most during a transfer of power, Raskin argued, adding, "That's precisely when we need them the most, because that's when elections get attacked."
"Given the Framers' intense focus on danger to elections and the peaceful transfer of power, it is inconceivable that they designed impeachment to be a dead letter in the president's final days in office when opportunities to interfere with the peaceful transfer of power would be most tempting and most dangerous, as we just saw," he said.
Rep. Joe Neguse, D-Colo., took the floor after Raskin.
-ABC News Benjamin Siegel