Want to know why public pension funds are running out of money? Look no further than Dennis Gannon. Thanks to a perfectly legal loophole, the former Chicago sanitation department worker stands to receive a pension five times what the average Chicago city worker gets, according to an investigation by the Chicago Tribune.
Gannon's pension, said the Tribune, would be the largest of any retired union leader in Chicago -- $158,000 a year. In all, he stands to collect $5 million. His pension was juiced up after he was hired by the city for a single day in 1994 then granted an indefinite leave of absence. He retired from the city at age 50 a decade later.
The newspaper calls it "a prime example of how government officials and labor leaders have manipulated city pension funds at the expense of union workers and taxpayers."
Its investigation, conducted with WGN-TV, further found that "23 retired Chicago union officials stand to collect some $56 million from two ailing city pension funds."
Gannon, who is now working for Grosvenor Capital Management, a hedge fund that does work with public pensions, declined to answer quesions from the newspaper, but issued this statement. "I am extremely proud of my many years of service to the city of Chicago and the working men and women of organized labor. I have always followed the pension laws governed by the state of Illinois statute as well as the city of Chicago municipal pension plan."
In part because of such such fat payouts, pension funds are running out of money -- not just in Chicago but in Philadelphia and Boston, too. Two professors of finance are warning these and other cities: Fix your pensions problems fast.
An analysis by Robert Novy-Marx of the University of Rochester and Joshua Rauh of the Kellogg School of Management at Northwestern University found that public pension plans for America's 50 biggest cities and counties are underfunded by $382 billion -- or $14,000 for every household in those same cities. Some of the biggest plans may run out of money to pay promised benefits in as little as five to eight years.
Click here for a table of 50 municipalities with the biggest underfunded pensions. The table is at the end of the report.
Michael Zuccht, general manager of the San Diego Municipal Employees Association, said the problem has been building for decades.
Year after year, municipalities have put off fully funding their pension obligations, kicking the can down the road. Now, however, with the baby boom generation retiring, they're running out of money now.
"For 30 years elected officials have failed to meet these 'boring' obligations," said Zuccht, referring to his city's and others' pension plans. "They preferred to spend their money on 'exciting' things like parks and libraries and recreation. Guess what? It's come due now. It's hit the fan."
Cities claim their liability is less -- only $190 billion, or $7,000 per household. But Rauh and Novy-Marx said this lower figure is the result of government accounting that assumes too rosy a return on assets and underestimates the cost of pension promises. The professors use private sector accounting standards, then calculate how long the assets in each fund (as of June 2009) could keep paying out the benefits promised, as of that same date.
Philly, by their reckoning, has only five years until it can't pay. Boston, Chicago and New York, have eight.
Of the 50 cities in the study, 20 won't be able to pay their promised benefits after 2025.
Philadelphia Finance Director Rob Dubow took issue with the study. "It's an academic model that looks at what would happen if we didn't put any more money in during the next five years. Yes, then we would run out. But that's not going to happen. Our contributions over the next five years will be well over $2 billion."
The city's plan, he said, calls for the pension fund to be paid up in full over the next 29 years. If you're a Philadelphia employee today, how should you feel? "You should feel you're going to get your pension," said Dubow.
The danger Philly faces, he admitted, is real. Pension costs have risen from just under $200 million a year to $400 million today. In five years, he said, they'll be $600 million.
Cities have few options. To shore up pension funds, they can raise taxes or redirect spending: They can pave fewer potholes, close libraries or cut back on other services like schools, fire and police. The problem, of course, is that disgruntled citizens can always move elsewhere, depleting the local tax base.
To cut costs, some cities are experimenting with alternatives to the traditional defined-benefit plans. San Diego, for example, wants to give new hires a savings vehicle similar to a 401(k). Philadelphia offers them a blended plan that combines features of a traditional pension and a 401(k).
How about reducing benefits to workers whose pensions have already vested?
Merely to ask this question is to draw a gasp from lawyers, union leaders and city managers alike.