Ovarian Cancer Screening Not Effective, Panel Says

Ovarian Cancer Screening: More Harm Than Good?

In the ongoing phase of the trial, 9 percent of women have required repeat testing for abnormal results. As in the pilot phase, fewer than 1 percent of women had surgery to investigate abnormal results. Nonetheless, false-positive results were the trigger for surgery in 47 of 97 (48 percent) cases, leading to major complications in 4 percent of cases.

"The USPSTF concludes that there is adequate evidence that there is no mortality benefit to routine screening for ovarian cancer with transvaginal ultrasonography or single-threshold serum CA-125 testing, and that the harms of such screening are at least moderate," the panel wrote.

"Final results from [the British study] should provide more information about the relative benefits and harms of an algorithm-based approach to screening for ovarian cancer."

The panel noted that the recommendation is consistent with those of other major medical organizations -- including the American Cancer Society and American Congress of Obstetricians and Gynecologists -- which have recommended against routine screening for ovarian cancer in asymptomatic women.

The complete statement is available online.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...