American Cancer Society Stands By Cancer Screening Guidelines

WEDNESDAY, Oct. 21 (HealthDay News) -- The American Cancer Society says it is not currently rethinking its stance on cancer screening, as was widely reported Wednesday.

"We are not redoing or rethinking our guidelines at this time, nor are we going to restate our guidelines to emphasize the inadequacies of screening," said Dr. Len Lichtenfeld, deputy chief medical officer of the American Cancer Society.

The society continually revises its screening recommendations and issues new guidelines every year, usually in January. Moreover, current guidelines do not minimize any problems with screening, Lichtenfeld stated.

"We have always been talking about the limitations of screening," he said. "That's not really news."

For instance, the cancer society revised its prostate cancer screening guidelines several months ago to emphasize the fact that it does not recommend PSA screening for everyone but does recommend that men have "informed discussions with health-care professionals before embarking on a screening program," Lichtenfeld said.

Also, the cancer society has never maintained that mammography screening for breast cancer is perfect. "Mammography misses lesions. We know that we do find more lesions than might otherwise cause a woman harm, but that's something we've known and talked about for a long time," he said.

A report published Wednesday in The New York Times said that the American Cancer Society was planning to post a message on its Web site early next year delineating the risks of overtreatment resulting from excess screening. Responding to the article, Lichtenfeld said that "I'm not aware of that and if it was, in fact, happening, I would have knowledge of it."

In an official statement released Wednesday, the cancer society acknowledged that the "advantages of screening for some cancers have been overstated," but also added that "there are advantages, especially in the case of breast, colon and cervical cancers."

The statement, from the society's chief medical officer, Dr. Otis Brawley, said that the organization "stands by its screening guidelines" and that "women are encouraged to continue getting mammograms."

The apparent confusion stems largely from popular media reports that, in turn, seemed to have been spurred by an opinion piece published in the Oct. 21 issue of the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

A press release accompanying the JAMA article included quotes from Brawley, agreeing with the authors' conclusions.

According to the JAMA authors, from the University of California, San Francisco, and the University of Texas Health Science Center at San Antonio, increased screening rates for breast and prostate cancers have resulted in more diagnoses but have not translated into correspondingly lower death rates, incurring "potential tumor over-detection and over-treatment," the researchers wrote. Although mortality from cancer in general has decreased, the authors conceded, it's unclear how much of this is because of more screening.

Why might increased screening not translate into saved lives, as the two experts contend? Probably because more aggressive tumors are still not found in time to save the patient, according to one specialist.

A major issue facing oncologists, especially for breast and prostate cancers, is being able to separate the very bad cancers from the less dangerous tumors.

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
null
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...