Looking for True Love? Consider Birth Order, Says Author

VIDEO: Style expert Brittney Levine shares ideas for gifts with a masculine twist.
Share
Copy

"Fun-loving, raven-haired beauty who loves good food and good wine looking for a guy with a great sense of humor who loves the outdoors. Last-borns only."

If author Linda Blair is right, anyone looking for a compatible romantic partner will consider another important trait in addition to a sense of humor, sensitivity and a nice career: birth order.

In her new book, "Birth Order: What Your Position in the Family Really Tells You About Your Character," author and psychologist Blair says whether a person is a first-born, a second-born, lower down or a last-born can say a lot about a personality and in turn, can help determine whether two people are a suitable match.

"Each of these birth-order positions has specific characteristics. Not only are they likely to apply to your new boyfriend, but they also apply to you," Blair wrote in a book excerpt published in the British newspaper the Daily Mail.

As an example, Blair says that two first-borns could make a volatile partnership.

"Among the most difficult partnerships are those between two first-borns. If you're both highly competitive, conflict is very likely when both of you want to be in charge," Blair writes.

Other psychologists aren't so sure about how much of a role birth order should play in finding a life partner, and some even say that birth order doesn't play much of a role at all in who a person becomes. Other mitigating factors are more important.

Research Goes Back a Long Way

There have been a number of studies that looked at the role of birth order on intelligence and social traits. Some studies found that first-born children tended to be more intelligent than later-borns, while other studies found no relationship at all. Other research showed first-born children accepted more responsibility and are more self-confident. Birth order research goes back centuries.

"Starting in the 1800s, people started to assume that birth order is really important," said Toni Falbo, a professor of educational psychology at the University of Texas at Austin. "Sometimes the beliefs were built upon historical customs at the time. For example, in England, first-born sons inherited everything and everyone else got nothing."

More modern studies found that first-born children started talking earlier and were more achievement-oriented. In the 1990s, researchers pointed out that 21 of the first 23 American astronauts and 52 percent of presidents were first-born or only children.

Alan Hilfer, a psychologist and director of internship training at Maimonides Medical Center in Brooklyn, N.Y., says in his experience, birth order does reflect a pattern of traits.

"First-born kids tend to be more outspoken. They often had a lot of attention on their own. A lot of stimulation means a lot of expectations put into them by their parents," he says.

Second-born kids, on the other hand, are more used to sharing and accustomed to negotiating and recognizing they may not always get what they want.

While he says he sees these patterns a lot, they don't always hold, and there are a lot of factors that could account for the differences.

"There are so many mitigating variables, like whether it's a single-parent family, and whether a later-born child is gifted or athletic. It's very hard to make a blanket statement."

Page
  • 1
  • |
  • 2
Join the Discussion
You are using an outdated version of Internet Explorer. Please click here to upgrade your browser in order to comment.
blog comments powered by Disqus
 
You Might Also Like...