South Carolina primary 2024: Trump projected to win, Haley vows to stay in the race

I'm honestly not sure there is a clear way to go about establishing what Trump "should" be winning, Mary. On the one hand, polls had him at 61 percent, so 60 percent of the vote (as of now) is pretty good — especially if you consider he'll win the nomination easily by mid-March if this is the case.

Another benchmark would be the percent of the GOP electorate that calls themselves "part of the MAGA movement." According to preliminary ABC exit polls, that's about 44 percent of SC voters (50 percent said no and 6 percent were unsure). So by this benchmark, Trump is actually overperforming.

Too bad there aren't a whole lot of modern examples of former presidents + failed presidential candidates running in subsequent primaries, or else we could try to establish historical baselines. Trump's performance right now is somewhere between George H.W. Bush vs. Pat Buchanan and Jimmy Carter vs. Ted Kennedy. Both of those incumbents lost in the general.

—G. Elliott Morris, 538

I'm on the fence. As I pointed out, this would be panic-time for a sitting president running for reelection — evidence of a significant rift in the party. And it's not a mystery what that rift is — people in the Republican party who have reservations about Jan. 6, Trump's electability or his presidential temperament. At the same time, he has majority support in most polls, far outpacing any rivals.

—Julia Azari, 538 contributor

The first few primaries to me don’t seem to suggest the kind of strength that I would expect from a universally known, pretty well-liked (within his party) former president. So, is Trump doing well in this race, or is he just doing better than Haley? And does that mean anything for November?

—Mary Radcliffe, 538

The South has historically been a politically distinct region. This distinctive character — associated for a long time with strong, conservative Democratic affiliation — has been really important in explaining how the Democratic presidential nomination calendar has evolved. Super Tuesday was initially pushed to strengthen Southern influence and give an advantage to moderate candidates. South Carolina itself was moved to a more prominent spot in the primary calendar because many of its Democratic primary voters are African American — unlike in the traditional early states of New Hampshire and Iowa.

But what does this mean for Republicans? The South has been a Republican stronghold for most of the twentieth century, though Democratic presidential candidates have pulled off occasional victories. And South Carolina hasn't been a distinctly regional primary for Republicans (though Georgian Newt Gingrich won the GOP primary there in 2012). Nikki Haley doesn’t seem to be enjoying much home state (or region) advantage there. And Trump, who is from New York, is consistently popular in the South.

The larger point here is probably that, now that it’s generally in the Republican column, the South has been much less exemplary of unique regional politics, and instead has similar issue positions and priorities as other Republican strongholds.

—Julia Azari, 538 contributor