How do we explain what seems like this disparate or illogical reaction?
Democratic leaders argue that it is a communications problem or a marketing problem, and that average Americans just don't realize how awesome things are. They focus on the inability to get the message out that everything is great on the economy, either blaming poor communication skill at the White House or blame Fox News or some other conservative media outlet for blocking positive information.
Neither side seems to want to go deeper to discover what is really going on, or their solution for the problem comes out of their traditional out-of-date playbooks.
Let's start with the fact that these old indicators of a booming economy no longer tell the true story of what is going on in people's lives. Big economic data or global statistics are out of sync with the economics of citizen's personal lives. Unfortunately many including the media use this data as the way to tell the story of the American economy. It just isn't so. Through the booms that have occurred numerous times in over a generation, the average American's household income has not grown. Average Americans haven't been impacted by booms in Republican administrations or in Democratic administrations. Whether you look at the Reagan, Clinton, Bush or Obama presidencies, the majority of the country has seen no real rise in their personal economic situation.
Recently the New York Times featured some data that provides an explanation for why the overall data seems to convey a broad economic expansion, but most Americans feel very little if any impact. Up through the 1970s a majority of the income gains during economic expansions went to a majority of the citizens. Starting in the 1980s this shifted dramatically when 80 percent of the gains went to the top 10 percent, continuing this same unfortunate pattern in the 1990s, and has gotten even worse today. The data shows that in this recent expansion 95 percent of the gains have gone to the top 1 percent of the country! No wonder a majority of the country sees no relationship to positive economic data and their life.
What should we do?
My humble suggestion is that we need to have a well-paying jobs program tied to infrastucture improvements administered locally by cities, counties and states where people still trust government to get the job done. And this should be funded by tax policies at the federal level which put a much bigger burden on the wealthy in this country. The federal government would merely be a collector of the money, then disburse it to more trustworthy entities, and the money would be managed and spent at the local level.
There you have it.
Matthew Dowd is an ABC News analyst and special correspondent. Opinions expressed in this column do not reflect the views of ABC News.