Defense moves for directed verdict to end trial
Former President Trump's defense team has moved for a directed verdict in the trial, arguing that New York Attorney General Letitia James has failed to meet the evidentiary standard necessary for the case to continue.
"The claims of the attorney general involve only successful and profitable loan transactions," defense attorney Christopher Kise argued. "There's no victim, there's no complainant, there's no injury."
Judge Arthur Engoron already determined in a pretrial partial summary judgment that Trump engaged in fraud by duping banks and insurance companies into giving him favorable loan terms based on statements of financial condition that overvalued his assets and inflated his net worth, leaving the trial to determine additional actions and what penalty, if any, the defendants should receive.
The defense is arguing that the state has failed to present evidence that a bank or insurance company complained of fraud or that Trump failed to meet his financial obligations.
"There's no intent to defraud, no defaults, no breach, no unjust profits and no victims," Kise said. "There's no record evidence that anything would have been different with the loan transactions or the insurance transactions."
Defense attorney Jesus Suarez asked Ivanka Trump during cross-examination yesterday what Deutsche Bank executives said after providing the financing for Trump's purchase and renovation of the Doral golf club in Miami.
"They were very happy," Ivanka Trump responded.
"If they believe they're being defrauded by someone, they're not doing business with them," Kise said of the banks.