'They knew it was wrong,' attorney says of Willis, Wade
Defense attorney John Merchant made a lengthy case for Fani Willis' disqualification under the law -- and also laid out how even the appearance of conflict could undermine the public's confidence in their prosecution and justify her removal.
"You know it when you see it," Merchant said. "They did this, they knew it was wrong, and they hid it."
Merchant laid out the case for dismissal in plain terms, as he and the other defendants see it: Willis and Wade conspired to bring this case to enrich themselves with public money, then "used that money to go on personal vacations and trips."
"We frankly couldn't care less if they had a relationship outside of work," Merchant said. But "if the court allows this kind of behavior ... the entire public confidence in the system will be shot and the integrity of the system will be undermined."
"[Willis] put her boyfriend in the spot, paid him, and then reaped the benefits," Merchant said.
Judge McAfee pressed Merchant about whether the amount of money Wade spend on vacations for himself and Willis -- which she said she paid him back in cash but has no record for -- was a relevant factor. Merchant calculated the amount to be more than $9,200, and the judge asked whether a subordinate buying their boss a stick of gum, for example, would merit disqualification.
"I don't know if $100 would be enough, $200 be enough -- I think you have to look at it globally" and in context, Merchant said.