New Hampshire primary 2024: Trump projected to win, Haley vows to fight on
Trump and Biden had strong showings in the first-in-the-nation primary.
Former President Donald Trump will win the 2024 New Hampshire GOP primary, ABC News projects. As of 10 p.m. Eastern, Trump was ahead by less than 10 percentage points. While that represents a slight overperformance of polling for former U.N. Ambassador Nikki Haley, even a close loss is a big hit to her prospects, as she had staked her campaign on a strong performance in the Granite State. Haley spoke shortly after the projection to emphasize that "this race is far from over," while Trump (and his allies) amped up calls for her to drop out.
ABC News has also projected that President Joe Biden will win the Granite State's Democratic primary. A comfortable write-in victory for him despite not even being on the ballot is a good sign for the incumbent.
Latest headlines:
Trump voters are the least likely to change their mind
In the latest Suffolk University/Boston Globe/NBC 10 Boston tracking poll, primary voters in New Hampshire who plan to vote for Trump were surer of their choice than voters for any other candidate. Eighty-one percent of Trump voters said they were not at all likely to change their mind, compared with 68 percent of Haley voters.
—Mary Radcliffe, 538
Who has campaigned hardest in New Hampshire?
According to data collected by 538’s Mary Radcliffe and Cooper Burton, through yesterday, Haley had held 77 public, in-person campaign events in New Hampshire since she jumped into the presidential race last February. By contrast, Trump held only 17 events in New Hampshire between yesterday and his campaign announcement in November 2022.
Those numbers hint at the very different approaches to campaigning that the two candidates have taken in New Hampshire. Haley has crisscrossed the state trying to meet — and personally convince — as many voters as possible, while Trump has largely eschewed retail politics, instead relying on his popularity and media attention to garner votes. (And it works for him — he won Iowa in dominating fashion despite not campaigning very much there, either.)
New Hampshire also accounts for a much greater share of Haley’s total campaign events (39 percent) than of Trump’s (17 percent) — or for that matter most of the dropped-out presidential candidates’. That’s a reflection of how central New Hampshire is to her hopes of winning the nomination. (She even suggested as much at one of her town halls there, when she declared that “Iowa starts” the presidential race, but voters in New Hampshire “correct it.”) She absolutely must win here to have a shot, and her campaign schedule has reflected that.
—Nathaniel Rakich, 538
New Hampshire voters talk Trump, immigration and gas prices
Last week I was in New Hampshire and sat down with Trump, DeSantis and Haley supporters to talk about why they’re voting for their chosen candidate. The Haley supporter, who voted for Biden in 2020, said that if Haley does not win the primary, she will vote for Biden or independent candidate Robert F. Kennedy Jr. in the fall. The DeSantis supporter told me he was committed to voting for Trump if he wins the primary, even if the former president is convicted of a felony before Election Day.
Immigration was the No. 1 issue for the Trump and DeSantis supporters, while leadership qualities were most important to the Haley supporter. Although these are only three people and not a representative sample like a poll, the themes I heard were reflective of the kinds of trends we’ve seen in issue polling in New Hampshire, which Monica has written about and mentioned earlier. If you want to hear straight from some New Hampshire voters themselves, check out the conversation here:
—Galen Druke, 538
What the 2016 Republican primary can tell us about 2024
The 2016 Republican nomination race was a far more crowded affair, but the New Hampshire primary that year can still tell us something about tonight. Eight years ago, Trump won with just 35 percent of the vote, but he carried most cities and towns in the Granite State because the vote was heavily fragmented. (Like in much of New England, New Hampshire’s municipalities, not counties, are the more important administrative divisions.) Overall, six candidates won between 7 and 35 percent statewide, and the next-closest contender was John Kasich, who won only 16 percent.
Looking at the 2016 map, the areas that Trump carried with less than 40 percent — colored pink or light purple — will hold the key to tonight’s result. This is especially true of areas in the south-central to southeast portion of the state, which produced about three-fourths of the _total_ 2016 Republican primary vote. We’ll want to see to what degree Trump has won over Republicans in these areas — and just how many independent voters show up, as the polls suggest they are more likely to prefer Haley.
One key area to watch will be the Seacoast, New Hampshire’s southeastern corner. This part of the state has many affluent and highly-educated towns where Kasich ran just behind Trump, such as Portsmouth and Stratham. To have any chance of an upset, Haley will need to perform strongly here, and hope that the region’s Democratic-leaning independents decide to participate in the GOP primary (much of the area is strongly Democratic). Haley would also need to hold down Trump’s margins in the most vote-rich part of the state, the south-central Merrimack Valley, which includes New Hampshire’s two largest cities — Manchester and Nashua — while also making inroads in highly-educated towns in the same vicinity, such as Bedford and Amherst. At the same time, the southeastern part of this region was much more strongly pro-Trump in 2016, so the degree to which he can run up the score in places like Salem will be important.
Moving slightly north, the capital of Concord is solidly Democratic, but it still cast the third-most GOP primary votes after Manchester and Nashua in 2016. Trump won less than 30 percent there, so it’s another must-watch spot. To the northwest, the areas where we’d largely expect Haley to win — and she needs to win big — are highly-educated areas along the Connecticut River (the Vermont border) such as Lebanon and Hanover (home to Dartmouth College), which Kasich carried eight years ago.
—Geoffrey Skelley, 538
Trump’s evangelical base is missing in New Hampshire
New Hampshire is one of the least religious states in the country. That might help explain why Trump’s closest competitor, Haley, has closed in on his lead a bit there: He’s at 54 percent to her 36 percent. While in 2016, evangelical Christians and regular churchgoers were reluctant to throw their support behind Trump, this key Republican voting bloc is now his solid base. And they’re missing in this first-in-the-nation primary.
In Iowa last week, Trump improved on his 2016 caucuses performance by 35 points in the most evangelical areas of the state, according to a Washington Post analysis. That’s just the latest evidence that evangelical voters are his to lose. In the 2020 general election, he won 59 percent of voters who attend church at least monthly, according to a Pew Research Center analysis. More than that, Trump moved many of his voters to identify as evangelical Christian, regardless of their church attendance habits.
Evangelicals remain one of the most motivated, active parts of the Republican Party nationwide, and, without that, Trump’s campaign might be missing a little steam. In addition to being less religious, New Hampshire residents have other identity markers that pull them further from Trump’s base. It’s one of the most educated states in the country, and has had an active Libertarian Party. In this respect, New Hampshire Republicans are a bit different from their fellow party members in other states. All of these factors might be giving Haley a small opening, but Trump is still favored to win.
Looking beyond that toward November, New Hampshire has voted for the Democratic candidate in every election save one since 1992. So while the eventual Republican nominee will have a shot, the less religious nature of New Hampshire might be a sign that the state is simply becoming more solidly Democratic like its New England neighbors, at least when it comes to presidential elections.
—Monica Potts, 538