What the Comcast-Time Warner Cable Deal's Demise Means for Consumers

Don't cheer just yet about the end of the Comcast-Time Warner Cable deal.

Today's confirmation of the proposed deal's demise ends a journey that began more than a year ago, when Comcast and Time Warner Cable announced plans to merge and create the largest Internet service provider in the country. The combined company would have had five times the subscribers of its closest competitor, the Electronic Frontier Foundation said. This week, the FCC announced a major barrier to the plan when it requested a hearing about the merger.

"If Comcast bought Time Warner Cable, it would have had the ability to single-handedly control the broadband and media marketplaces," John Bergmayer, senior staff attorney for consumer advocacy group Public Knowledge, told ABC News.

The new company would have had the ability to "crush" new competitors, such as online video providers, he said.

"It would have been able to reduce consumers’ ability to access diverse programming and Internet content. Prices would go up, not just for Comcast’s subscribers, but for consumers nationwide," he said. "The FCC and the Department of Justice understood this, and stopping this deal is a huge victory for consumers."

A spokesman for Time Warner Cable told ABC News in a prepared statement: "We are moving forward and are 100 percent focused on running Time Warner Cable for the benefit of our customers, employees and shareholders. The improvements we’ve made in customer service and technology are only going to get better and grow stronger as we continue to invest in our business and move forward."

A spokeswoman for Comcast declined to comment beyond a statement released by Comcast's chairman and CEO.

Public Knowledge said the end of the merger doesn't fix everything that's wrong in the broadband and cable marketplaces. New video and connectivity services are just starting to emerge, and competition may still be at risk, the group wrote on its website.