Malibu Declares War on B-list Beach Parties
City ordinance aims to curb the number of corporate-sponsored celeb parties.
March 17, 2008 -- Malibu, Calif., is different from most small cities. Having American Express' ultra-exclusive black card in your purse and a Mercedes in your driveway doesn't make you stand out. Having your face on the cover of Star Magazine doesn't mean people stop, stare and bow to your every whim.
In fact, if you're going to use the beach to fish for the paparazzi's attention, many Malibu residents would rather you didn't come at all.
This week, the city council passed a new law to restrict the use of beach homes rented by companies staging promotional events. Since their 2006 inception, these beach house parties have proved attractive to the likes of Lindsay Lohan and Paris Hilton and the associated paparazzi that follow.
"Imagine parties every night until 4 in the morning when you're trying to sleep just eight feet away in the house next door," said Councilman Andy Stern, who sponsored the new ordinance. "These weren't just people having a good time; they were commercial enterprises in residential areas that would be operating 24/7 during the summer months."
One such corporate-funded rental was the Polaroid Beach House, located along a strip of sand referred to as Billionaire Beach.
Celebrities happily arrived en masse and basked in the free food and products from whatever brand name was sponsoring that day's event.
In return, the stars posed with these products for the swarming paparazzi. Critics said this glitzy scent soon turned into a pungent tabloid aroma that began to take its toll on residents.
And when one particular resident is real estate and insurance mogul Eli Broad, whose net worth is just south of $6 billion, any B-list bravado soon melts away.
"On any given Monday morning, Eli Broad would be calling city hall with a list of what he'd had to put up with the previous weekend," said Jay Marose, a PR guru who worked alongside Fingerprint Communications in developing the Polaroid Beach House.
"Located between what used to be our house and the Silver Spoon Beach House he had to put up with paparazzi literally circling around his property," he said.
Marose told ABC News he had it on good authority that this type of media intrusion was a factor in the Arquette family's decision to recently sell its Malibu property.
However, the likes of Broad and film producers David Geffen and Jeffrey Katzenberg were not willing to move on. Along with other residents they made it clear to the city that celebrities belonged on set and not in their backyard.
"This place last summer just became overwhelmed by trash, cars and people -- we were basically trapped in our homes," said John Mazza, who has lived in Malibu for 35 years and counts Barbara Streisand among his neighbors.
"It used to be a sleepy little place where a different class of star would come to get away from it all," Mazza said. "Now these young girls like Britney Spears don't come here to relax but to be seen."
City officials said that the strong views of longtime residents were the key motivation behind the attempt to restore Malibu to its more tranquil past. The sheer number of unhappy homeowners was the driving force, not the status of an influential few.
According to Malibu City Manager Jim Thorsen, valet companies were the only third parties that profited from events that benefited only the sponsors that wined and the celebs that dined.
The new ordinance is expected to go into effect April 24, pending final approval.
With sand now all but thrown into the works of party profiteers, officials say Malibu will not necessarily adopt the vivaciousness of a retirement-home community as a result.
"Parties are not banned in Malibu," said Malibu Mayor Jeff Jennings. "We're allowing four major parties per property each year but any party over 100 people needs a permit from the city and we won't be allowing places to have parties on the beach every day."
With such words ringing like sweet music to the ears of fatigued Malibu residents, it was likely received as more of a cacophony by those who will now have to set up shop elsewhere.
Asked what it thought of the ruling, the reply from Fingerprint Communications was curt. "We have no plans [for next summer] right now," said company PR rep Laura Duran. "We'll let you know."
While most residents are pleased with the new law, some still worry that it doesn't go far enough and that the sponsored parties will get around the ordinance by jumping from house to house. Councilman Andy Stern says that won't happen.
"They can go wherever else they want but here in Malibu we'll have a sheriff's deputy shut 'em down," said Stern, a man whose name bares a striking resemblance to his nature.