ANALYSIS: John Kelly's impossible mission as White House chief of staff

Dismissing Anthony Scaramucci sent an important signal that Kelly is in control.

— -- He’s got the job – but will he be able to do it well?

The consensus among Trump’s friends and associates is that if anyone can tame the wild rivalries at play inside the Trump White House, it’s Kelly. His military background serves dual purposes – as a model for decision-making structures he hopes to impose, and as a source for respect from the president downward.

Of course, Kelly inherits Trump himself. The White House can only be effectively managed so far as the president himself lets it, or want it, to be.

“I don't think he is going to look to change Donald Trump, because that would be a mistake,” Lewandowski said. “The president doesn't need to be controlled. He’s the greatest communicator we have ever had.”

It’s not the president’s effectiveness in communicating a message that’s in question, though. It’s his judgment and his credibility in doing so.

Then there’s Russia, and the news on Monday that the president decided to personally help craft a statement on behalf of his son, which is adding additional concerns for even those rooting for the president to succeed. Kelly will be pushed from all sides on the probe – by those calling for independent investigations to continue, and by a president who is on record many times calling all the Russia probe a “witch hunt.”

On Monday, after Kelly was sworn in as chief of staff, Trump lavished praise on him as a “fantastic leader” who has gotten “tremendous results.”

Then, a man used to running his own businesses and who is still adjusting to politics adjourned for a cabinet meeting: “We'll see you in the boardroom,” Trump said.