Amy Coney Barrett begins Supreme Court confirmation hearing

Here are highlights of how both sides set the stage for questioning.

The high-stakes confirmation hearing for Judge Amy Coney Barrett, President Donald Trump’s Supreme Court nominee, got underway Monday as Senate Republicans push for a final vote before Election Day despite Democratic calls to let voters decide who should pick a new justice.

Trump nominated Barrett to fill the seat left by the late Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg.

The four days of Senate Judiciary Committee hearings, overseen by chairman Sen. Lindsey Graham, are unprecedented, with some members participating virtually and in-person. Barrett will appear at the witness table to face questions each day.

Hearings start at 9 a.m. each day and will be live streamed on ABC News Live.

Barrett, 48, a devout Roman Catholic, was a law clerk to conservative Justice Antonin Scalia, considers him her mentor and follows his originalist interpretation of the Constitution. She practiced law at a Washington firm for two years before returning to her alma mater, Notre Dame Law School, to teach. She was nominated by Trump to the Seventh U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals in May 2017 and confirmed by the Senate that October in a 55-43 vote.


0

Senate Judiciary Committee resumes hearing 

After a short break, the hearing resumed around 12:20 p.m.


Here’s the breakdown for the rest of the day:

The remaining six senators on the committee who have not spoken will deliver their 10-minute opening statements. Then, Judge Barretts’ two home state senators, Republican Sens. Mike Braun and Todd Young of Indiana, and the former dean of Notre Dame Law School who hired her, Patricia O'Hara, will have five minutes each to introduce her.

Finally, Graham will swear Barrett in, and she will deliver her opening statement to the committee.

-ABC News’ Trish Turner


Biden says Barrett's faith 'should not be considered'

As he boarded his plane to Ohio this morning, former Vice President Joe Biden was asked whether Democrats should raise Barrett’s faith in her confirmation hearings.

“No, her faith should not be considered,” Biden, also a practicing Catholic, told reporters.

"This nominee said she wants to get rid of the Affordable Care Act, the president wants to get rid of the Affordable Care Act,” Biden said.

“Let's keep our eye on the ball. This is about whether or not in one -- less than one month, Americans are going to lose their health insurance,” Biden said.

--Molly Nagle and John Verhovek


Blumenthal tells Barrett: 'You must recuse yourself' from any election-related cases

Sen. Richard Blumenthal, D-Conn., said he was “deeply concerned” that the Supreme Court is losing the trust of the American people. He called on Barrett to recuse herself from any election-related cases as the president sows doubts in the results of the election alongside her confirmation process.

“Now President Trump and the Republican senators are eroding and indeed destroying that legitimacy,” Blumenthal said, speaking of the court.

“Your participation in any case involving Donald Trump's election would immediately do explosive, enduring harm to the court's legitimacy and to your own credibility. You must recuse yourself,” Blumenthal continued. “The American people are afraid and they are and for good reason. It is a break-the-glass moment.”

He had noted earlier that Barrett had “auditioned'' for the job through her academic writings and judicial opinions that suggest she would have voted to strike down the Affordable Care Act had she been a justice at the time.

Blumenthal also made clear he will oppose her nomination which he sees as being “about the Republican goal of repealing the Affordable Care Act, the Obamacare they seem to detest so much.”


Hawley claims Democrats show 'religious bigotry,' defends Barrett’s Catholic faith 

Sen. Josh Hawley, R-Mo., who made President Trump’s Supreme Court shortlist of potential nominees himself, used his opening statement to define “a pattern and practice of religious bigotry” he said Democratic members of the committee have shown against Barrett.

"This freedom of conscience and religious liberty underscores all of our other rights because it tells the government that it cannot tell us what to think or who we can assembly with or how we can worship or what we can say,” Hawley said. “This bedrock principle of American liberty is now under attack.”

Hawley deemed stories attacking Judge Barrett's faith "an attempt to bring back the veto power of the powerful over the religious beliefs and sincerely held convictions of the American people.”

He suggested a public official’s freedom of religion is at stake in the confirmation hearing.

“Judge Barrett is a Catholic. We all know that... Heck, 65 million Americans are Catholics and many, many millions more are Christians of other persuasions. Are they to be told that they cannot serve in public office? That they are not welcome in the public here unless the members of this committee sign off on their religious beliefs?” Hawley said. “I don't want to live in such an America.”

“I hope when we look back at the confirmation hearings for Judge Amy Barrett -- soon I hope to be Justice Amy Barrett -- one thing I hope we say is that was the year that the attempt to bring back religious test for office was finally stopped,” Hawley concluded.

He did not mention Trump has repeatedly attacked the faith of his political rivals.


Leahy hits on dangers of holding high-stakes hearing, says his constituents are ‘scared’ of Barrett's nomination 

Sen. Patrick Leahy, D-Vt., hit on the shame he said Republicans should feel as Barrett’s nomination ceremony took place just one week after the passing of Justice Ginsburg.

“We should not have had a nomination ceremony before Justice Ginsburg was even buried, while the nation was mourning her passing,” Leahy said. “We should not be here, holding that hearing just 16 days later when the committee has afforded itself three times as long to vet other nominees to the nation's highest court.”

Leahy also noted the number of Republicans he said have gone “back on their word” as they push the nomination through when millions of Americans have already voted just three weeks from a presidential election.

“Doing so requires literally half of the Senate, goes back on their word. Think of that for the Republican colleagues. Clearly half of the Senate had to break their word, contradicting every argument they've made for years, about the American people needing a voice during election year vacancies,” he continued.

Leahy, as did Feinstein, said in addition to the rushed nature of the nomination, his constituents are “scared” about the fate of the Affordable Care Act should Barrett be confirmed to the court.

“That is what weighs heavily on me as we begin these hearings and also weighs heavily on the minds of those I represent, and I have heard from them, as Justice Ginsburg's passing, they are scared, Judge Barrett,” Leahy said.

“They are scared that you will rip away the health care protections that millions of Americans ought to maintain and which Congress has repeatedly worked on eliminating. They're scared that the clock will be turned back to where women had no right to control their own bodies and when it was acceptable to discriminate against women in the workplace. They're scared that there is a time when we are facing the perilous impacts of climate change... And they're scared that your confirmation will result in the rolling back of voting rights, workers' rights, and the rights of the LGBTQ community to equal treatment," Leahy said.