Let the Madness Begin: Less Than 100 Days Out From Primary, Candidates Swarm New Hampshire

Over the next 17 days, candidates will travel to the Granite State.

— -- White House hopefuls have been visiting New Hampshire for months. But on Wednesday, the real parade begins.

“Stephen Bullock created the New Hampshire primary,” explained Secretary of State William Gardner, who oversees voting in the state. “He did that in 1913, and this was his working desk.”

The state representative from Richmond traveled by horse and buggy to the state house to propose what was still a relatively new concept -- a primary to allow citizens to determine their party’s nominee. Bullock’s bill became law in time for the 1916 election, making next year’s contest the 100th anniversary of the New Hampshire primary.

To celebrate, Gardner has brought Bullock’s desk into his modest office, along with Richmond’s original ballot box -- meaning onlookers will be crammed even tighter than usual as candidates begin streaming in Wednesday morning.

The corridors, as well as Gardner’s office itself, will remain open to the public throughout the filing process, setting the stage for some entertaining political theater.

“One guy sat down, started playing his guitar, and wouldn’t leave,” Gardner recalled from an earlier election cycle, noting candidates continued filling out their paperwork. Another year, a man took off his shirt and pants -- revealing a change of clothes underneath.

“But then he took off those clothes! So now you’ve got a pile of clothes on the floor,” Gardner said, laughing. “He had kind of lost it.”

Whether you’re a billionaire or an unknown, the filing fee is the same: $1,000, making New Hampshire one of the most affordable states in which to get your name on the ballot. A simple form declaring your eligibility, along with a list of delegates to represent you at a convention, is the only paperwork required.

“You can have some pretty powerful figures in this country standing next to a pretty average person,” said Gardner, who takes pride in the state’s inclusiveness. “They get on the ballot the same way. And the voters do the screening. No one else.”

But New Hampshire’s first-in-the-nation primary has come under fire lately from prominent members of each party.

“Well, that’s not anything brand new,” sniffed Gardner, noting that it was a young Harry Reid who once backed a bill placing Nevada’s caucus ahead of New Hampshire. It was later vetoed by the governor, who said he didn’t want to foster ill will between sister states. Besides, Gardner said, New Hampshire never battled to become first in the nation.

“We never took it from any other state,” he said, adding that Indiana voted a week earlier in 1916, before scrapping its primary for years. “We didn’t plan on this, it just evolved. ... And just because a state had better weather, or was bigger, or more powerful, we weren’t going to give it up.”

The tradition likely won’t change anytime soon. It has the support of candidates -- no doubt wary of angering voters in such crucial states -- and perhaps more importantly, the state legislature. New Hampshire law dictates the primary take place at least seven days before any other. Iowa, as a caucus state, does not figure into the law.

The small size of the state also plays into its popularity among campaigns. Candidates can criss-cross the state as needed, and enlist volunteers in all ten New Hampshire counties far more easily than Iowa’s 99.

“Isn’t this something?” Gardner asked. “That the little guy can change the course of history? And why can’t we have the same thing?”

Starting Wednesday, several underdogs, led by O’Malley, will be hoping Stephen Bullock’s desk brings them luck -- in a state that’s been making or breaking White House runs for a hundred years.