US Military Provides Inspector General With Afghan Troop Data After All

It claimed last week that the information was classified.

In a reversal the U.S. military in Afghanistan has now provided specific declassified statistics about Afghanistan’s security forces to the inspector general that a week ago it said should remain classified.

Those statistics had been routinely provided for public release to the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) for inclusion in previous reports. But the latest quarterly SIGAR report issued last week only included the information in a classified appendix.

For six years, the SIGAR has produced regular reports that track the progress of the $65 billion the United States has spent to build Afghanistan’s infrastructure, development and security forces. Those reports have included information about the Afghan security forces such as troop numbers, attrition rates, salaries, training and equipment.

The quarterly report released last week included that information in a classified appendix available only to government officials with a high enough security clearance.

"I am deeply concerned with the implications of this sudden classification decision and have raised it with the appropriate officials," said John Sopko, the Special Inspector General for Afghan Reconstruction following the release of the report.

Last week, Gen. John Campbell, the commander of U.S. forces in Afghanistan, explained his decision to classify the information in a letter to Sopko.

At the time, he wrote that while he could not comment “upon the precise reason why certain information was considered unclassified in the past, I can advise that given the risks that continue to exist to our forces and those of Afghanistan, I have directed that sensitive operational information or related materials, that could be used by those who threaten the force, or Afghan forces, be classified at an appropriate level.”

He added, “With lives literally on the line, I am sure that you can join me in recognizing that we must be careful to avoid providing sensitive information to those that threaten our forces and Afghan forces, particularly information that can be used by such opposing forces to sharpen their attacks,” wrote Campbell.

Lt. Col. Patrick Seiber, a spokesman for Campbell, says the military has since gone back and separated the public data it could provide to SIGAR that had previously been combined with classified readiness information about Afghan security forces.

“General Campbell has not changed his position in regard to the importance of protecting ANSF readiness data, which remains classified,” Seiber said in a statement.

“Clearly, they realized they had made a mistake or that they over-classified in this case,” Bronstein-Moffly told ABC News.

However, the last of those reports was released in October with the pending end of the combat mission in Afghanistan in December.