Silicon Valley Heavyweights Say Encryption Bill Is 'Unworkable'

New bill aims to compel companies to help access data in certain cases.

Calling the bill's policies "well-intentioned but ultimately unworkable," the letter, dated Tuesday, says creating government-mandated security vulnerabilities, often referred to as a back door, would "weaken the very defenses we need to protect us from people who want to cause economic and physical harm."

"This mandate would mean that when a company or user has decided to use some encryption technologies, those technologies will have to be built to allow some third party to potentially have access. This access could, in turn, be exploited by bad actors," the letter says.

The coalition of companies "respond expeditiously to legal process and emergency requests for data from government agencies" but also design their software and hardware to include features that strongly protect customer privacy "in the face of threats from both criminals and governments."

"We support making sure that law enforcement has the legal authorities, resources, and training it needs to solve crime, prevent terrorism, and protect the public. However, those things must be carefully balanced to preserve our customers’ security and digital information," the letter says. "We are ready and willing to engage in dialogue about how to strike that balance, but remain concerned about efforts to prioritize one type of security over all others in a way that leads to unintended, negative consequences for the safety of our networks and our customers."

Brad Smith, Microsoft's president and chief legal officer, said in a blog post that Microsoft has been sworn to secrecy by the U.S. government regarding 2,576 legal demands. Of those secrecy orders, Smith said 1,752 had no fixed end date, meaning "we effectively are prohibited forever from telling our customers that the government has obtained their data."