An Early Warning System for Earthquakes

Dec. 4, 2006 — -- What if an earthquake were coming, and you had just a little bit of warning? It might be only 15 seconds, maybe 30 -- but it might be enough time to take cover under a table, or find the safety offered by a door frame.

Italian scientists say they have figured out a way to measure the shock waves from a quake just two seconds after they begin, and, from that, calculate the earthquake's strength, location, and potential for damage in populated regions.

American researchers have been at work on this as well, hoping to set up an early warning system in California and other earthquake-prone areas.

Faster Than a Speeding P-Wave

If researchers succeed, they might be able to place seismometers up and down fault lines, and measure the P-waves -- the primary shock waves from an earthquake -- several critical seconds before they reach the places where people live. P-waves may be useful for warnings; they are not nearly as strong as secondary vibrations -- known as S-waves -- that do most of the damage.

It typically takes about 10 seconds for P-waves to spread 40 miles. S-waves travel about half as fast.

But a warning signal, transmitted electronically from a seismometer near the epicenter, would spread at the speed of light.

That could mean extra time for gas companies to close automatic valves on their supply pipes, electric companies to isolate the vulnerable sections of their grid and people to run for cover.

Earthquakes are, by nature, chaotic. Many geologists have been skeptical that the first P-waves can tell very much about the strong vibrations to follow. But the new research suggests they're reliable for setting off warnings.

"We can determine the magnitude within a couple of seconds of initiation of rupture and predict the ground motion from seconds to tens of seconds before it's felt," said Richard Allen, an assistant professor of earth and planetary science at the University of California, Berkeley, when he and colleagues published a paper on early warnings last year in the journal Nature.

ElarmS

Allen is part of a team that has been at work on a project called ElarmS -- short for Earthquake Alarms Systems. They calculate that in the worst earthquakes, a well-designed system could give San Francisco, for instance, an extra 20 seconds to put systems in safe mode.

That is, if the warnings are accurate. Nobody wants a very expensive system that constantly gives false alarms. ElarmS has been held up by political arguments over its cost effectiveness.

That's where the Italian researchers come in. Writing in an upcoming issue of the journal Geophysical Research Letters, they report that in just the first two seconds after a major earthquake, they can get enough data for an accurate picture of where it will spread, and how violent it will be.

They say they tested their calculations on more than 200 earthquakes in the Mediterranean Basin, and found that the early P-waves were very reliable as indications of the stronger S-waves to follow.

"The earthquake size can be, therefore, estimated," they write, "while the rupture itself is still propagating and rupture dimension is far from complete."

Could all this make a difference when a major earthquake strikes? Science has been frustrated in its attempts to predict when one will happen, so, as many geologists argue, every nanosecond's warning will help.