New York 3rd District special election: Suozzi projected to defeat Pilip

Democrats cut into Republicans’ already narrow House majority.

By538 and ABC News via five thirty eight logo
Last Updated: February 13, 2024, 7:00 PM EST

Democrat Tom Suozzi has won the special election in New York’s 3rd District, defeating Republican Mazi Pilip to flip a House seat from red to blue. (The seat was formerly held by Republican Rep. George Santos, who was expelled from Congress in December after a series of scandals.) As a result, Republicans’ already narrow House majority has been reduced to 219-213.

Throughout the night, 538 reporters, analysts and contributors have been live-blogging the results in real time and breaking down what (if anything) they mean for November. Read our full analysis below.

Latest headlines:

Here's how the news is developing. All times Eastern.
Jacob Rubashkin Image
Feb 13, 2024, 11:07 PM EST

Answer: Special elections are special

I'm always skeptical of reading too much into the results of special elections. I mean, just remember Democrats' blockbuster night in August of 2022 in New York, when they won one competitive special and narrowly flipped another solid Republican seat. Those results didn't translate into Empire State success that fall. But I do think it tells us something about Long Island, namely, that Democrats can still win there. That wasn't a given; the party has lost pretty much every competitive election there for the past three years, with candidates who have tried both tacking to the left and right. Now that we know Democrats can still win over voters there, the two other potential pickup opportunities on Long Island (the Suffolk-based 1st District and Hempstead-based 4th District) become that much more believable. And with just 4 seats separating Democrats from the majority, that's a big deal.

—Jacob Rubashkin, Inside Elections

Geoffrey Skelley Image
Feb 13, 2024, 11:05 PM EST

Answer: A single special election with low turnout is very ¯\_(ツ)_/¯

I don't want to dismiss tonight's result as meaningless, because it's not. However, we should be careful not to over-interpret it as a signal for what could happen in November. My main reason for saying this? Turnout. ABC News's current expected vote projection is about 185,000 total voters. To put that in perspective, 271,000 voters cast ballots in the 2022 3rd District race in what was a high-turnout midterm (for the most part). And in 2020, 398,000 voters would've cast ballots for president in the 3rd District under its current lines, according to Daily Kos Elections' calculations. To be fair, the 2020 presidential race was the highest-turnout election in modern times, but despite the tepid excitement about a likely Biden-Trump rematch, I anticipate another relatively high-turnout presidential contest. So there will be a lot more voters voting in November than in a February special election that also featured inclement weather. Just how the multitude of more marginally-engaged voters who show up in 9 months respond to the electoral environment is an open question.

—Geoffrey Skelley, 538

Nathaniel Rakich Image
Feb 13, 2024, 11:04 PM EST

Answer: This election shouldn’t change our priors

—Nathaniel Rakich, 538

Tia Yang Image
Feb 13, 2024, 11:02 PM EST

Question: Does this tell us anything about November?

We've talked about the fact that tonight's race was between an unusual pair of candidates, under unusual circumstances (special elections, Santos, snow storms, oh my!). But would we be election analysts if we didn't debate ... Does tonight's result tell us anything about November?

—Tia Yang, 538