Supreme Court rejects GOP attempt to block extended ballot deadline
The Supreme Court has rejected Pennsylvania Republicans' second attempt to block an extended deadline for mail-in ballots for the 2020 election.
The high court announced the 5-3 decision Wednesday evening that it will not expedite a Republican request to stop the state's extended deadline for receiving mail-in ballots, a small and potentially temporary victory for Democrats who believe mail-in ballots in the battleground state could determine the election.
Justice Amy Coney Barrett did not participate in the case "because of the need for a prompt resolution of it and because she has not had time to fully review the parties' filings," the court's spokeswoman said.
The court's order did leave open the possibility that the justices could take up the measure again and decide after voting whether a three-day extension to receive and count absentee ballots ordered by the state's high court was proper. The decision leaves open a potential question as to the validity of any ballots received after Election Day.
Justice Samuel Alito, writing for the three dissenting justices -- himself, Justice Neil Gorsuch and Justice Clarence Thomas -- indicated he would support the court's eventual review of the issue but wrote, "I reluctantly conclude that there is simply not enough time at this late date to decide the question before the election."
Earlier in the month, the Supreme Court deadlocked 4-4 on whether to block the extension -- effectively leaving in place a Pennsylvania Supreme Court decision that mandated the extension. Republicans were hoping Barrett's place on the court could produce a different outcome. In the end, Justice Brett Kavanuagh joined the majority in this decision.
Experts say due to the expected record amount of mail-in voting, election night could be more like election week, but Trump said earlier in the day he expects the courts would "hopefully" block any ballot deadline extensions.