Defense attorney Alina Habba, delivering her closing argument, showed the jury a series of caustic tweets to make the case that E. Jean Carroll failed to prove she suffered the kind of reputational harm she said Donald Trump caused.
"As you can see, the total number of views of all these tweets that they feel best represents their case is a total of 143 views," Habba said. "That's not evidence of reputational harm."
Habba accused Carroll of enjoying the attention her accusation has created. "Ms. Carroll loves her new reputation and her life. My client is not enjoying this," she said.
"Let's not forget Ms. Carroll is making more money now than she was in June 2019," Habba said.
Habba said that in 2019, Carroll had hit "financial and social rock bottom" and decided to climb her way back to a lavish lifestyle with celebrity friends by making a public accusation against Trump.
"She made an allegation in the most public form by design," Habba said, adding that Trump had repeatedly made his position clear.
That drew an objection from the plaintiffs that was sustained by the judge, since Trump is not allowed to cause the jury to doubt an earlier verdict that held Trump liable for sexual assaulting and defaming Carroll.
"It is established," Judge Kaplan said.
"It is established by a jury," Habba added.
"It is established, and you will not quarrel with me," the judge said.
When Habba resumed, she mocked the reputational repair expert who testified that rehabilitating Carroll would cost as much as $12 million -- particularly the idea that conservative commentators Joe Rogan and Candace Owens should be paid to help Ms. Carroll repair her reputation.
"What planet are we living on?" Habba said.
The plaintiff's rebuttal will follow the defense's closing.