Trump trial: Trump hit with contempt, witnesses detail Stormy Daniels deal

Following Keith Davison's testimony about the deal between Karen McDougal and AMI, prosecutor Joshua Steinglass turned to the topic of Davidson's representation of Stormy Daniels.

Davidson recounted a conversation he had in 2011 with Cohen after a blog first posted a story about the Trump and Stormy Daniels affair allegations.

First, he said he got a call from Daniels's talent manager, Gina Rodriguez:

"The blog post had published and apparently I was informed that Gina had received a phone call from Michael Cohen," Davidson testified. "Gina called me up to tell me that some jerk called me and was very, very aggressive and threatened to sue."

"And I would like you, Keith, to call this jerk back," Davidson recounted Gina told him.

"I hate to ask it this way, but who was that jerk?" prosecutor Steinglass asked Davidson.

"Michael Cohen," Davidson said.

Davidson said he did call Cohen back, and proceeded to tell the jury about that call.

"It was to the Trump Organization. I called and was transferred to Michael Cohen," Davidson said. "I introduced myself and before I could barely get my name out, I was just met with a hostile barrage of insults and insinuations and allegations that went on for quite a while."

In the courtroom, both Trump and his attorney Todd Blanche appeared to laugh as Davidson continued with this description of Cohen.

"What did you tell him?" Steinglass asked.

As Karen McDougal's attorney Keith Davidson continued his testimony, jurors were shown the final contract between McDougal and AMI that prohibited her from talking about past relationships with a "then-married man."

"Karen had ... granted her limited life rights related to the subject matter -- any affairs with any then-married man -- to AMI," Davidson testified, telling jurors that Donald Trump was the "then-married man" referenced in the contract.

Asked by prosecutor Joshua Steinglass the reasons he believed AMI would spend $150,000 on a story they didn't plan to publish, Davidson said, "I think there were two. I think one explanation that was given was that they were trying to build Karen into a brand," and didn't want to compromise her reputation, he said.

"The second was more of an unspoken understanding that there was a close affiliation between (publisher) David Pecker and Donald Trump, and that AMI would not run this story ... because it would tend to hurt Donald Trump."

"You mean, hurt Donald Trump's campaign?" Steinglass asked.

"Yes," Davidson said.

Davidson previously testified that when the deal was finalized, he called Michael Cohen.

"I called him and let him know as a professional courtesy that the deal involving his client closed," Davidson said.

"What client is that?" Steinglass asked.

"Donald Trump," Davidson said.

Steinglass asked Davidson how Cohen received the news.

"He was pleased," Davidson said.

An appellate court has denied former President Trump's bid to have Judge Juan Merchan recused from his hush money trial.

Trump's application sought a stay of the proceedings and Merchan's recusal.

Both were denied without explanation by the appellate judge.

All nine of former President Trump's social media posts cited by Judge Juan Merchan in his contempt of court ruling this morning have been removed.

The judge ruled that the nine posts violated the limited gag order prohibiting Trump from targeting potential witnesses and others involved in the case.

The nine posts were deleted during the court's lunch break.