Judge will wait to rule on defense's expert witness
After the jury was dismissed for the day, Judge Merchan heard arguments from the two sides on whether the defense should be allowed to call an expert witness to explain to the jury how to interpret nuances in election law, particularly the phrase "for the purpose of influencing an election."
"We don't think this jury here should be evaluating a FICA violation," defense attorney Emil Bove argued.
Prosecutors objected, saying only the judge should inform the jury what the law is.
There is a "general and widely followed prohibition" against having testimony from witnesses about the law, prosecutor Matthew Colangelo argued, adding that Bove's request "flies directly in the face" of an earlier order issued by Merchan.
"The jury has to be provided instructions one way or another ... about how to apply these principles," Bove argued back.
Merchan said he would think about it over the weekend, but told the defense, "Until you hear differently from me, my ruling has not changed" that their requested testimony would not be permitted.